Re: fop 19
Peter B. West wrote: > Does anyone know what happened to fop 19? Did the tag go away? It does Probably there has never been one .. > not show up in a cvs status of build.xml. I ask because the starting > point for my code was 19, and I would like a point nearby to branch from > for my initial migration. You might try cvs checkout -D 2001-06-15 (not tested, date from dist directory) > Peter Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FOP .19 problem on AS/400 platform
vincent van der linden wrote: > > Dear developers, > > We are using fop for a while on our IBM AS/400 midrange > system. A recompiled Fop 18.1 (with font support fix) > is the recent installed version. Hooray, another FOP user on AS/400 ;-) > Are you aware of fop problems on a AS/400 (it uses unix > api's to perform the java functions) ? our jdk is > 1.1.8. I just tried the latest version from cvs on our AS/400 (V4R5) and it worked without problems (even the new Postscript renderer!). But I'm using JDK1.2 and the FOP Driver class (no commandline) with a SpooledFileOutputStream from the AS/400 Toolbox for Java >The resulting errors are : > > java.lang.NoSuchMethodError > java/lang/Error.()V+1 (Error.java:43) Sounds like a classpath issue... I'd first try it again with JDK1.2 > Thanks in advance. > > Vincent van der linden > XML consultant Christian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
