Re: fop.xconf

2004-03-04 Thread J.Pietschmann
Peter B. West wrote:
What's the intention for fop.xconf? 
It's been there for ages with the intent to provide for
configurable, easily changed defaults. Unfortunately
1. There's not much more than PDF filters (in the maintenance
 branch), and if all filters are deleted, the code uses a
 flate filter anyway (which means you have to provide a
 nop filter in order to have a look at the uncompressed
 PDF code).
2. The fop.xconf, userconfig and command line options
 are not merged, although they should.
J.Pietschmann



Re: fop.xconf

2004-03-03 Thread Glen Mazza
I haven't looked at it--but this was before my time on
the project, fop.xconf hasn't been altered since
December 2002.  It appears to be related to
Avalonization of FOP.  For the benefit of other
relative newcomers, it is located here:

http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-fop/conf/fop.xconf

And the project's earlier discussion on it is here:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-devw=2r=1s=fop.xconfq=b

Glen

--- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Fops,
 
 What's the intention for fop.xconf?  Is it to be
 processed by the user 
 agent?  What about user configuration?  Have these
 things been decided yet?
 
 Peter
 -- 
 Peter B. West
 http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html