Re: userconfig.xml

2002-03-13 Thread David B. Bitton
--cvVnyQ+4j833TQvp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable So, then would that be JAVA_HOME? When I checked user.dir, i got c:\winnt\= system32. On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 08:55:22AM +0100, Beer, Christian wrote: Yeah.

Re: userconfig.xml

2002-03-12 Thread David B. Bitton
Revelation: Now I know why System.getProperties(user.dir) == c:\windows\system32, because that's where the Tomcat NT service must start from (not to mention the java.exe that's in that folder also). Hmm, what to do? Ok, so how can I have a not so relative path? Conundrum: How can I gain

Re: userconfig.xml

2002-03-10 Thread Polly Tsang
illis virtute valemus. - Original Message - From: Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:49 AM Subject: Re: userconfig.xml Polly, You are not the first, nor will you be the last, to be thrown by this. All of the work of the Options

Re: userconfig.xml

2002-03-08 Thread David B. Bitton
B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 12:49 AM Subject: Re: userconfig.xml Polly, You are not the first, nor will you be the last, to be thrown by this. All of the work of the Options object is done in the constructor. You don't have to do anything

Re: userconfig.xml

2002-03-07 Thread Peter B. West
Polly, You are not the first, nor will you be the last, to be thrown by this. All of the work of the Options object is done in the constructor. You don't have to do anything more with it. It sets up a lot of static data, accessible by static methods, in a Configuration class. Have a look