Re: Status update: hyphenation (no, not the pattern file licenses)

2003-07-05 Thread J.Pietschmann
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Well, separate the reusable stuff from the FOP-specific stuff (package-wise). Other Apache projects have started sub-(sub-)projects. Maybe we could do something similar if only to encourage decoupling of utility components that could be used elsewhere. Additional candidates:

Status update: hyphenation (no, not the pattern file licenses)

2003-07-04 Thread J.Pietschmann
Hi, as I wrote quite some weeks ago I took an extended look at hyphenation, with the possible target of creating APL licensed patterns from our own dictionaries. I also looked at the current hyphenator. I finally seem to have grasped how hyphenation and hyphenation pattern generation from a marked

Re: Status update: hyphenation (no, not the pattern file licenses)

2003-07-04 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 04.07.2003 22:59:27 J.Pietschmann wrote: Interestingly, nobody seems to care all that much. Do people proof read their output? LOL snip what=a lot of interesting-sounding stuff/ RT: I believe the lexicon(s), pattern generator, the hyphenator and perhaps other tools could be useful for

Status update

2003-03-07 Thread Jeremias Maerki
The switch to full license headers is done in the trunk. That leaves the AltDesign branch. BTW, we're down to around 1430 Checkstyle violations. We started at amost 10'000! And there should be no more unnecessary import statements, so FOP will look good when they do the check next time. :-)