(comments inline)
On 24.12.2003 19:02:41 Clay Leeds wrote:
On Dec 24, 2003, at 8:55 AM, Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 15:39, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Apparently this was admitted by earlier versions of the spec. Older
versions of FOP still supported this, but
On Dec 24, 2003, at 4:03 PM, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
wouldn't it be reasonable to also accept the obsolete 'master-name'
and to
just print out a corresponding warning message instead of throwing an
error? AFAIK, the attribute has only been renamed to
'master-reference',
but its meaning and
Hi,
I was looking for xsl-fo test suites on the net and found
http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/
but for some reason all the test in the NIST zip file uses master-name
instead of master-reference on the fo:page-sequence's.
fo:page-sequence master-name=test-page-master
Is there some
-Original Message-
From: Finn Bock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I was looking for xsl-fo test suites on the net and found
http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/
but for some reason all the test in the NIST zip file uses master-name
instead of master-reference on the
I was looking for xsl-fo test suites on the net and found
http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/
but for some reason all the test in the NIST zip file uses master-name
instead of master-reference on the fo:page-sequence's.
fo:page-sequence master-name=test-page-master
[Andreas L. Delmelle]
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 15:39, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Finn Bock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I was looking for xsl-fo test suites on the net and found
http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/
but for some reason all the test in the
On Dec 24, 2003, at 8:55 AM, Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
On Wednesday 24 December 2003 15:39, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Apparently this was admitted by earlier versions of the spec. Older
versions of FOP still supported this, but the latest version throws an
error...
wouldn't it be reasonable to
HI all:
I developed the NIST test suite. I will look into this issue Friday
morning. Regrettably I can't dot this minute. I was under the
impression that the stated problem was solved years ago.
I will post something soon after Christmas.
Carmelo
At 03:29 PM 12/24/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Clay Leeds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 24, 2003, at 8:55 AM, Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
wouldn't it be reasonable to also accept the obsolete 'master-name'
and to
just print out a corresponding warning message instead of throwing an
error? AFAIK,