Victor,
Trying to answer your latest questions on this topic has absorbed a deal
of my time, exposed a contradiction in my thinking, and made me think
through in more detail some of the fuzzy bits. I am still working on
it, and I will get back to you. Thanks for the interrogation.
Peter
--
P
Peter B. West wrote:
> They can. They must. But then what happens to the idea that the FO
> tree can be processed and refined before the layout occurs? If you are
The pieces that can be processed are. The pieces that cannot are deferred.
> tree can be processed and refined before the layout o
Peter B. West wrote:
If I have not answered your question, yell out. I am quite happy to
keep on at this until you at least understand my thinking on this, even
if you don't agree with it.
But I will be keeping on with it tomorrow, as it is very late here.
Peter
--
Peter B. West http://www.pow
Victor Mote wrote:
Peter B. West wrote:
Which modules? I'm not sure what you mean. The modularity of area
processing? The Rec gives an utterly spurious view of this. It has
been misleading developers since the drafts were first published, and
giving the impression that things can be neatly mo
Peter B. West wrote:
> Which modules? I'm not sure what you mean. The modularity of area
> processing? The Rec gives an utterly spurious view of this. It has
> been misleading developers since the drafts were first published, and
> giving the impression that things can be neatly modularised.
