/show_bug.cgi?id=31570
page break and keep together do not work well together
Summary: page break and keep together do not work well together
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.5
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity
/show_bug.cgi?id=18038
duplicated links on page break, in table with keep-together each row
Summary: duplicated links on page break, in table with keep-
together each row
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.5
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
/show_bug.cgi?id=18038
duplicated links on page break, in table with keep-together each row
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-16 13:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=5354)
XSLFO that reproduces the problem
/show_bug.cgi?id=18038
duplicated links on page break, in table with keep-together each row
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-16 13:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=5356)
Screen capture of Adobe Acrobat showing the duplicate links
/show_bug.cgi?id=17830
FOP0.20.5rc and keep-together=retrieve-marker doesn't work correctly
Summary: FOP0.20.5rc and keep-together=retrieve-marker doesn't
work correctly
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.5
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Other
/show_bug.cgi?id=17830
FOP0.20.5rc and keep-together=retrieve-marker doesn't work correctly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
... Check the FOP website regularly for the status of the redesign.
To stave off the biggest FOP FAQ after doesn't keep-* work in Fop?,
ie. what's the schedule for the redesign?, could it perhaps be an
idea to post a weekly bulletin on the devel list?
Just
/CHANGES
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-fop/status.xml
On 27.02.2003 20:33:26 Steinar Bang wrote:
Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
... Check the FOP website regularly for the status of the redesign.
To stave off the biggest FOP FAQ after doesn't keep-* work in Fop?,
ie. what's
Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
... Check the FOP website regularly for the status of the redesign.
To stave off the biggest FOP FAQ after doesn't keep-* work in Fop?,
ie. what's the schedule for the redesign?, could it perhaps be an
idea to post a weekly bulletin on the devel list
/show_bug.cgi?id=7241
keep-with-previous, keep-with-next only working on the first page break
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-12-20 22:10 ---
I have exactly the same problem: works first page break, doesn't work second
page break -- didn't try consecutive page breaks, but I
/show_bug.cgi?id=3044
keep-together not functioning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
/show_bug.cgi?id=7449
Large table row with keep-together=always runs FOP infinitely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
The keep properties will be adressed in the redesign. That was one of
the main reasons the redesign was started in the first place. The
support for keep properties on table-rows will stay as it is in the
maintenance branch. The redesign is on its way but we can't tell you a
date when
Hi all,
is any one implementing keep properties? If so i need
some information about keep properties.
Thanks
sri
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
/show_bug.cgi?id=7241
keep-with-previous, keep-with-next only working on the first page break
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-21 12:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=3909)
Testcase (Version 0.20.4
/show_bug.cgi?id=7241
keep-with-previous, keep-with-next only working on the first page break
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|0.20.3
/show_bug.cgi?id=7241
keep-with-previous, keep-with-next only working on the first page break
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-20 13:18 ---
Provide an example please (fo document, add it as attachment
Hy
I to, had problems with the keep-together. I tried it with blind tables,
but it
seemed not to work with Fop 0.20.4.
I thought, it was a new bug since Fop 0.20.3.
With Fop 0.20.2 it had worked within tables.
Is it so ?
Regards
P.Steiner
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von
Steiner, Priska wrote:
I to, had problems with the keep-together. I tried it with blind tables,
but it
seemed not to work with Fop 0.20.4.
h'm, afaik it works for me, post small snippet of your fo.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn International, Israel
fo:table-body
fo:table-row
fo:table-cell padding-top=0.5cm
fo:block font-family=Arial
font-weight=bold keep-with-next=alwaysxsl:apply-templates
select=standEreigTitel/xsl:apply-templates
fo:block font-family=Arial
font-weight=bold keep-with-next=always
The problem is here: keep-with-next does *not* work if placed
on a fo:block. Move this to the fo:table-row above:
fo:table-row keep-with-next=always
You did read the messages detailing it, like
http
Hello,
I am exploring the possibility of modifying the code to allow support for
keep-together. I'm pressed for time; so a hack will work. I would
appreciate any input on if this is possible and how long it would take?
Thank You,
Shaifali Prakash
CHT / Media Entertainment
San Francisco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am exploring the possibility of modifying the code to allow support for
keep-together. I'm pressed for time; so a hack will work. I would
appreciate any input on if this is possible and how long it would take?
Search the source for keep- (case insensitive
Mete Kural wrote:
Is there any estimate on when the keep-together
property will be implemented?
No.
The FOP Project is great although as you know it's
still being developed. While I wait for FOP to be
developed, what other free XSL-FO formatters can I use
to generate PDFs?
Try passivetex
J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Try passivetex. You have to install a full TEX package, apart from
this it is quite excellent.
Doesn't it also have problems with keep-* attributes?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hello FOP committers,
Is there any estimate on when the keep-together
property will be implemented?
The FOP Project is great although as you know it's
still being developed. While I wait for FOP to be
developed, what other free XSL-FO formatters can I use
to generate PDFs? I'm in dire need
Hi All
I have template where I have fo:block, inside there are 4 tables and other blocks.
And I need to keep all this on the same page.
Af cource I have read documentation and there are some mentions about
keep-together.within-page
I did:
fo:block keep-with-next.within-column=always keep
The keep-with stuff is only implemented for tables. And I'm not sure
that all of it really is. Try wrapping your block in simple tables and
specify the keep-with attributes on the table-row. I've sucessfully used
keep-with-previous=always and keep-with-next=always on table-row.
Good luck.
Hi
Thanks for speaking up. I didn't follow this topic so I missed that.
Seems like I've been lucky only having two-page-documents where I used
keeps.
If you're past page 1, I think the keeps are turned off.
There was a big problem with running into an infinite loop when
the total layout area
Hello, Jeremias!
You wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 29 May 2002 18:19:39 +0200:
JM Thanks for speaking up. I didn't follow this topic so I missed that.
JM Seems like I've been lucky only having two-page-documents where I
JM used keeps.
And how did you get it working :-)
---
Yours
Well, I have a big table with 4 columns. Each part of the details of the
invoice is in its own table-row. But Joe's right. See the attached
testcase. If you build a PDF from it you'll see that keep-with-next has
an effect on page one but not on consecutive pages. Seem like I have to
revisit my
keep-with-next has an effect on page one but not on consecutive
JM pages. Seem like I have to revisit my stylesheets... :-(
You have only one table.
But in my case I have more then one table and do not brake my tables, he is putting
page break
between tables
table
table/
page break
table/
/table
- Original Message -
From: Holger Prause [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 7:27 PM
Subject: keep-together.within-page implemented ?
Hello,
I have some problems using
keep-together.within-page and i am wondering if its implemented yet.
(Obviously
/show_bug.cgi?id=5434
keep-with-next, keep-with-previous do not work
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
/show_bug.cgi?id=3044
keep-together not functioning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
/show_bug.cgi?id=6045
keep-together.within-page=always not functioning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
/show_bug.cgi?id=3044
keep-together not functioning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Additional
/show_bug.cgi?id=3044
keep-together not functioning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From
David B. Bitton wrote:
Can someone give me a 100 words or less on keep-together? What I'm most
confused is using 1 through 9 as apposed to always. I think my
keep-together problem would be solved with this, but I'm not sure how to use
it. Tx :)
I don't think keep-together will solve your
David B. Bitton wrote:
I have a table with data that is grouped every two rows. The first row
has data in cells, and the second row is a span, and it has additional info.
How can I stop a page break between the two rows?
Have you already tried to set keep-with-next=always
on the first row
Anshuman wrote:
Thanx for the useful tip. I am able to break the long table body
into pages. But this led to another problem. I am using
fo:static-content flow-name=xsl-region-after/ to put the footer in
the page. But when the table breaks into more than one page, it overlaps
the area
Anshuman wrote:
Can any one tell me how can I keep space between two fo:flow tag
or between two fo:block tag ?
My problem is that I have a fo:static-content tag where I keep the
table header information and fo:flow where I keep the body. But when
the data in the header tags
Hi !,
The attribute
space-before did the trick for
me...
ASM
- Original Message -
From: Anshuman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 7:05 PM
Subject: How to keep space between two region/block/ ... while
rendering ?
Hi !,
Can any one tell
me how can I
/show_bug.cgi?id=7449
Large table row with keep-together=always runs FOP infinitely
Summary: Large table row with keep-together=always runs FOP
infinitely
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.3
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status
/show_bug.cgi?id=7241
keep-with-previous, keep-with-next only working on the first page break
Summary: keep-with-previous, keep-with-next only working on the
first page break
Product: Fop
Version: 0.20.3
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows
Stephen Bannasch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
keep-with-next still doesn't work on 0.20.3
It is implemented only for table rows.
The problem is very annoying when I have a figure
with a title on one page and the image on the next.
Put stuff that should be kept together in a one column
blind
keep-with-next still doesn't work on 0.20.3
I tried to add a comment to:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5434
but i couldn't figure out how (probably too late at night :-)
Anyway there is a very simple test case here:
http://concord.org/~stephen/fop-bugs/keep-with-next
Isn't it true that keep-with-next is still only implemented for the
table-row element?
-Matt
Stephen Bannasch wrote:
keep-with-next still doesn't work on 0.20.3
I tried to add a comment to:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5434
but i couldn't figure out how
the release fop-0.20.3rc-src.tar.gz now.
Is in this new release the keep-together.within-page property implemented
(the implimented.html doesn't say so, but i frankly don't know if it's
updated).
if it is implemented, you guyz wan't me to update the html-docs and send
them to you? (less work for you
/show_bug.cgi?id=5434
keep-with-next, keep-with-previous do not work
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-02-21 17:24 ---
This is still broken with fop-0.20.3rc2-src.tar.gz.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
/show_bug.cgi?id=5099
fop gets stuck in infinite loop when table rows with keep-with-next that together,
are larger than the current page
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
with FOP's internals can
tell me where to look...
I cannot help you much, but here's at least a reply to your offer ;-)
AFAIK getting keep-with... stuff to work requires serious redesign, which is
currently going on (Keiron and Karen?), but apparently fairly slowly.
Keiron would probably
way around the standard. I volunteer to try
to fix this, if someone who is more familiar with FOP's internals can
tell me where to look...
I cannot help you much, but here's at least a reply to your offer ;-)
AFAIK getting keep-with... stuff to work requires serious redesign, which
Hi All,
I'm am currently working on FOP version 0.20.2
As per my understanding keep-with-next keep-with-previous work only
with tables in case of this version. Also keep-together is not currently
supported.
Actually as per my requirements I want keep-with's to work for the block
object.
How do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have some questions with the keep and break stuff...
I tried to keep a fo:block together with this code:
fo:block keep-together=allways
This property is not yet fully supported. Even then the value
should be always.
but when i render my xsl xml to a pdf (through
hello,
i have some questions with the keep and break stuff...
I tried to keep a fo:block together with this code:
fo:block keep-together=allways
but when i render my xsl xml to a pdf (through JAVA) the block is
splitted over two pages. And i don't want it.
the block excists out off a table
/show_bug.cgi?id=5434
keep-with-next, keep-with-previous do not work
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-01-29 06:58
---
The same with FOP-0.20.3RC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
/show_bug.cgi?id=6045
keep-together.within-page=always not functioning
Summary: keep-together.within-page=always not functioning
Product: Fop
Version: 0.15
Platform: All
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Sorry if this has been asked before I just joined this mailing list, I was
on the xsl:fo mailing list before this.
Hello all,
I've been using FOP for some time now and I was wondering
does anyone know when keep-with-next will be fixed. FOP (xsl:fo) is so
cool but my VP is always saying
keep-with-next is implemented only for tables.
Take a look at docs\html-docs\implemented.html under the FOP home directory
to find out what is implemented.
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Flotho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 26. november 2001 14:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
It's my understanding, that right now keep-with-next is only implemented on
the table-row element. What's more, you can only use it when you know you
will not have any more rows than will fit on a page. Otherwise FOP goes into
an endless loop.
-Original Message-
From: Jörg Flotho
/show_bug.cgi?id=5099
fop gets stuck in infinite loop when table rows with keep-with-next that together,
are larger than the current page
Summary: fop gets stuck in infinite loop when table rows with
keep-with-next that together, are larger than
It's my understanding that keep-with-next=always at the row level is the
only keep-together | with-*=* property currently implemented in FOP. Is
this true? I've also noticed that if the number of rows included is too big
to fit on one page, you get an endless loop. This makes keep-with-next
Hi together,
I tried to use keep-together.within-page in a block, but I didn't see any changes!
Is this attribute not implemented?
Egmont
Keine verlorenen Lotto-Quittungen, keine vergessenen Gewinne mehr!
Beim WEB.DE
I need to keep paragraph headings together with the
paragraphs. As I understand from another mail this is not implemented in fop
yet. Any idea when this is likely to be implemented?
Thanks
-Rajendran
| |
+---+
so you will be able to keep row1 together with row2.
hth
daniel
--- Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: I need to
keep paragraph headings together with the
paragraphs. As I understand from another mail this
is not implemented in fop yet. Any idea when
Hi Suhail,
Actually to keep two different FO together, you need to use
keep-with-next or keep-with-previous. The keep-together property means
to keep an entire FO in the same page or column (if possible). For
example, if you put keep-together on an fo:block, FOP should try to keep
the whole
What I do in cases like this is to define the preceding block as the first
row in the table and use keep-with-previous or keep-with-next for each row.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Suhail Rashid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 7. september 2001 19:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: how
Hi,
As keep-together is not supported in
FOP as of now how can i ensure that a table
and a preceding block appear together on the
same page..
Please pass on any ideas u have..
Thanks in advance,
Suhail
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
committed? If not I'll take care
of it. Sorry I'm a bit
scattered...work is intense right now.
Regards,
Arved
At 09:03 AM 8/29/01 -0700, you wrote:
Hi Arved-
I submitted patches against 20.1 to do an effective
keep-with-next on list-item-label and
list-item-body,
except I assumed
i would be greatfull to work with someone on a
related problem, who
better overlooks FOP then i do at the moment .
right now i have some questions:
1. i do not fully understand about the numerical and
symbolic values for
the keep-* stuff.
the standard says (in 4.8 Keeps and Breaks
Hi Arved-
I submitted patches against 20.1 to do an effective
keep-with-next on list-item-label and list-item-body,
except I assumed an implied keep-with-next on
list-item-label. I would be glad to work with bodo on
this time permitting. It would probably be best, so
that there are not two
Sure, absolutely, I'll help out as a resource.
Did your patch get committed? If not I'll take care of it. Sorry I'm a bit
scattered...work is intense right now.
Regards,
Arved
At 09:03 AM 8/29/01 -0700, you wrote:
Hi Arved-
I submitted patches against 20.1 to do an effective
keep-with-next
Sandstrom
At 12:18 PM 8/27/01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i tried to use the keep-with-next property on a multi column page with
some text blocks that normally fits on one page with 4 columns.
my text consists of this sequence of text blocks: every 2nd block is
meant to be a headline
hi,
i tried to use the keep-with-next property on a multi column page with
some text blocks that normally fits on one page with 4 columns.
my text consists of this sequence of text blocks: every 2nd block is
meant to be a headline and the the following block is the paragraph
belonging
=3207
*** shadow/3207 Tue Aug 21 09:22:43 2001
--- shadow/3207.tmp.13052 Wed Aug 22 01:56:23 2001
***
*** 2,9
| Does not keep fonts size in region-before area
=3207
*** shadow/3207 Tue Aug 21 09:22:43 2001
--- shadow/3207.tmp.4158Tue Aug 21 09:22:43 2001
***
*** 0
--- 1,80
+ ++
+ | Does not keep fonts size in region-before area
I'm using XSLT with FOP to genarate PDF from XML files.
In my XML tags I have text pre-formated (with break lines).
When I put this text into a block, it turns all lines into one same compact
block.
As white-space is not implemented yet in fo:blocks I'd like to know if
there is a way to keep my
in fo:blocks I'd like to know if
there is a way to keep my break line in my fo:block ?
Would putting each separate paragraph in a separate block help you?
(and possibly putting all your blocks into another block)
Alex
=
Alex McLintock[EMAIL PROTECTED]Open Source Consultancy in London
have text pre-formated (with break lines).
When I put this text into a block, it turns all lines into one same
compact
block.
As white-space is not implemented yet in fo:blocks I'd like to know if
there is a way to keep my break line in my fo:block
=3044
*** shadow/3044 Wed Aug 8 08:26:09 2001
--- shadow/3044.tmp.5558Wed Aug 8 08:26:09 2001
***
*** 0
--- 1,128
+ ++
+ | keep-together not functioning
I am testing keep-with-next, keep-together, keep-with-previous. I'm using
them with fo:block, but it seems they don't work. Nothing appear in the
limitations page or the features page (except keep-with-next highlighted by
(broken)).
IMHO they don't work, but AMI true ?
Thanks
Hi
Looking at:
http://xml.apache.org/fop/implemented.html
only keep-with-next is implemented, but is also listed as broken. As for keep-together
and keep-with-previous these are not listed which means that they are not yet
implemented. Sorry
Regards
Mads
- Original Message -
From
At 09:36 AM 7/17/01 +0100, Alex McLintock wrote:
--- Struan Judd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If so might I request a small departure from the XSL:FO spec, if it is
straight-forward to implement. Please allow keep-together on fo:table-row.
I don't think deviations from the XSL:FO spec
Im XSL FO spec in article 6.7.9 fo:table-row keep-together, keep-with-
previous and keep-with-next properties are listed in The following
properties apply to this formatting object:. So why is keep-together
on table-row considered against spec?
pa
On 17 Jul 2001, at 9:36 Alex McLintock wrote
Subject: Re: Keep-together (and the other keep-*'s)
It's not against spec in my book either, but it's currently not
implemented in FOP, for table-row or for anything else.
The problem with all that keep-* stuff is that it's not that easy to do.
Actually, I was kind of mulling it over
to implement. Please allow keep-together on fo:table-row.
TTFN
Struan Judd * And so it begins ... ICQ: 4498196
http://neongraal.sf.org.nz
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Voicemail and Fax: +1 (201) 305-1011 x1006
Hi there,
Is there a chance, that the keep-together-property will be realised in
a (nearly)future release ???
When I use this property, it causes no error, but it also will not work
properly...
Is there another way to the same functionality about other properties ?
thx ANDREAS
Hello,i
have the following table:fo:table
keep-together.within-page="always"by using keep together the table
should not be broken at the end of thepage.FOP 0.17 doesn't give
any error messages.But the table is split at the end of the page.How can
I prevent the table from breaki
Falk,
keep-together is not supported presently..
Try keep-with-previous or
keep-with-next..
That may help.
Raju Dave
- Original Message --
Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:04:27 +0200
Subject: keep
Hello,
i have the following table:
fo:table keep-together.within-page=always
by using keep together the table should not be broken at the end of the
page.
FOP 0.17 doesn't give any error messages.
But the table is split at the end of the page.
How can I prevent the table from breaking ?
Thanks
I have an multiple fo:blocks each containing 5 fo:list-blocks. I want each of
the blocks to be kept together on a page. If the entire block, with it's 5
list-blocks can't fit on the page, I would like that entire block to move to the
next page. I have placed keep-together.within-page=always
92 matches
Mail list logo
