On 27.07.2005 23:26:48 Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Jul 27, 2005, at 20:45, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hi,
I got a test case for tables which raises not a technical but rather a
interesting conceptual question. Please have a look at the attached
test
case. It defines a table with two
On Jul 28, 2005, at 10:10, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 27.07.2005 23:26:48 Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
Indeed, doesn't look right. Given the value for the orphans property,
one still would reasonably expect the break to occur before the first
cell of the second row.
...or after the first 3 lines
On 28.07.2005 13:42:08 Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Jul 28, 2005, at 10:10, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 27.07.2005 23:26:48 Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
Indeed, doesn't look right. Given the value for the orphans property,
one still would reasonably expect the break to occur before the first
Jeremias,
thanks for explanations.
As commit I meant contribute of course. I'm already aware of the rule
that commit rights are awarded by voting.
Btw, I contacted JEuclid founder Stephan Michels yesterday. Unfortunately I
received no reply at the moment.
Will try to contact another project
I've been following this thread with interest. From a conceptual point
of view, I agree with Andreas. I can't see any situation where you might
want to have cells of the same row group on separate pages. Regardless
of how many rows a particular cell spans.
Is there nothing in the spec to give
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35918.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35918.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
