DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36082] - [PATCH] Relative URIs are not correctly resolved

2005-08-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36082. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36082] - [PATCH] Relative URIs are not correctly resolved

2005-08-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36082. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

TODO tags

2005-08-13 Thread J.Pietschmann
Hi devs, there is a @todo tag in BookmarkData.java. JavaDoc 1.4 doesn't know about this. Question: What's the current policy for marking TODO items? Hint: Eclipse up to 3.0 uses only TODO by default. Regards J.Pietschmann

Re: TODO tags

2005-08-13 Thread Manuel Mall
Actually when I run javadoc I get over 100 warnings. Many related to @TODO tags, quite a about incorrect @param and some about unresolvable @see. You want any help with fixing these? Just nominate a set of packages you want me to look at and I will go through fixing them up with respect to

Re: More about build.xml

2005-08-13 Thread Manuel Mall
One minor item to add. I have modified my local build.xml to include source=1.3 in the javac element. This means the bytecode my Java 5.0 environment generates at least runs under 1.4 and 1.3. This mainly helps me to switch between 5.0 and 1.4 without having to recompile. I wonder if this