DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37329] New: - More readable error messages

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37318] - fop.bat: NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/fop/cli/Main

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37329] - More readable error messages

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37330] - [PATCH] FOP Bridges not properly registered with Batik

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37330. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37329] - More readable error messages

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37318] - fop.bat: NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/fop/cli/Main

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37318. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37236] - [PATCH] Fix gradients and patterns

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37236. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37329] - More readable error messages

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Leading/trailing space removal in LineLM

2005-11-02 Thread Luca Furini
Manuel Mall wrote: So we end up with only two cases to consider: preserve white space and remove white space around a line break created by the Knuth algorithm. 1. Preserve white space: IMO in this case the space itself is actually not a break opportunity but there are now two break

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37329] - More readable error messages

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Leading/trailing space removal in LineLM

2005-11-02 Thread Manuel Mall
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 01:59 pm, Manuel Mall wrote: On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 04:18 am, Simon Pepping wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:40:42PM +0800, Manuel Mall wrote: This is probably a question for Luca or Simon. snip/ Glue and penalty items are removed at the start of a line. This is part

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37136] - external-graphic dimensions and rendering

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37136. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37136] - external-graphic dimensions and rendering

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37136. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37136] - external-graphic dimensions and rendering

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37136. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Leading/trailing space removal in LineLM

2005-11-02 Thread Luca Furini
Manuel Mall wrote: Luca wrote a longer response to this but my mail reader doesn't like the character set (is that topical or what?). Sorry, it looks really horrible ... still don't know what went wrong, but I won't do it again! :-) Any way at end Luca ask the question about the UAX#14

Re: linefeed-treatment=preserve

2005-11-02 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Nov 2, 2005, at 01:39, Manuel Mall wrote: On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 05:14 am, Simon Pepping wrote: On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:54:08PM +0100, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Nov 1, 2005, at 16:03, Manuel Mall wrote: Is it a) empty line line 1 empty line This one, IMO. I agree, a) Same as

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37329] - Relaxed validation NYI for fo:table-cells

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37329] - Relaxed validation NYI for fo:table-cells

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37329] - Relaxed validation NYI for fo:table-cells

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37136] - external-graphic dimensions and rendering

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37136. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Current FOText implementation + Refinement whitespace handling

2005-11-02 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
Hi all, (Manuel, I guess this is mostly directed to you, as you may already have been browsing the same classes...) Just wandering a bit through the FOText source code (follow-up on Manuel's recent thread on whitespace handling), and I stumbled upon the following suspicious little detail:

Re: Unicode compliant Line Breaking

2005-11-02 Thread Simon Pepping
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:17:08PM +0100, J.Pietschmann wrote: Simon Pepping wrote: Is our current hyphenation method a subset of Unicode's method? Umm. What's the relation between hyphenation and TR14 (except for handling soft hyphens)? I guess you confuse finding line breaks in general

Re: Leading/trailing space removal in LineLM

2005-11-02 Thread Simon Pepping
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 04:58:09PM +0100, Luca Furini wrote: Manuel Mall wrote: Luca wrote a longer response to this but my mail reader doesn't like the character set (is that topical or what?). Sorry, it looks really horrible ... still don't know what went wrong, but I won't do it

Re: Unicode compliant Line Breaking

2005-11-02 Thread J.Pietschmann
Simon Pepping wrote: I mean, will our current method of finding possible line breaking points using the hyphenation tables be part of a TR14 compliant system to find line break opportunities? In some sense yes, but I'm not sure what you really mean. Currently, spaces and slashes (/) as well

Re: zero width space

2005-11-02 Thread J.Pietschmann
Manuel Mall wrote: That seems to be the consensus, that is consider ZWS for line breaking but then discard and don't give it to the renderers. Renderers could deal with ZWS if the font would have a glyph for this character; unfortunately, that's not the case for the PDF standard fonts :-)

Re: Leading/trailing space removal in LineLM

2005-11-02 Thread J.Pietschmann
Manuel Mall wrote: a) Yes UAX#14 always breaks at the of a sequence of spaces b) But is also says that it assumes any trailing spaces in a line are being removed This conflicts with XSL-FO which can force spaces being retained therefore adjustments to the algorithm are necessary to cater for

Re: Leading/trailing space removal in LineLM

2005-11-02 Thread Manuel Mall
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 06:03 am, J.Pietschmann wrote: Manuel Mall wrote: a) Yes UAX#14 always breaks at the of a sequence of spaces b) But is also says that it assumes any trailing spaces in a line are being removed This conflicts with XSL-FO which can force spaces being retained therefore