+1
Congratulations!
Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/15/2005 03:14:12 PM:
This is it. Just to make it clear again: This is a a release vote and
therefore a PMC vote, but every FOP committer is invited to place his
vote or raise any objections. Noone gets ignored. Although
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37557.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37557.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:52 am, Christian Geisert wrote:
Hi,
I just created the Branch 'fop-0_90' for the release.
So you can go on hacking on the trunk ...
The commit for the README I just did should probably go into the branch
- can you do that Christian?
Manuel
I compared a newly built fop-0.90alpha1-src.zip with my source
directory from the repository. The following files are not in the
distribution zip file, while I think they should:
fop-0.90alpha1/KEYS
fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.BCEL.LICENSE.txt
fop-0.90alpha1/lib/xalan.LICENSE.txt
Manuel Mall wrote:
Ooops, that wasn't very efficient as I did more or less the same thing.
Oops, sorry. After several weeks of inactivity I thought
I could polish up the old sketch and commit. There's still
enough work to do though, see the separate post.
J.Pietschmann
A matter of definition, I guess. :-) Maybe we should really write
[0.90alpha1] instead of [Latest] then. Care to do that? Or what do you
prefer?
On 18.11.2005 21:43:18 Simon Pepping wrote:
Wouldn't latest point to the stable distribution, 0.20.5?
Simon
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:45:59PM
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:39:03PM +0100, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Hi,
a few thoughts about the layout engine test harness:
- It won't run if CWD!=project.home, i.e. ant -find build.xml from a
subdirectory fails the tests with a file not found exception.
Neither the disabled testcase file nor any
Ok, fixed, along with a few other things. Interesting how many little
things you can find that delay a release. :-)
With the current build in the branch we are able to create the 3
distributions that I see are necessary:
- Source distribution
- Binary distribution for JDK 1.3
- Binary
