Re: Bug in whitespace handling with linefeed-treatment=ignore?

2006-06-03 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Jun 3, 2006, at 05:14, Manuel Mall wrote: snip / I don't think anything is wrong here. The definition of linefeed-treatment was changed in XSL 1.1 (its all part of refinement now) and I believe we behave correctly with respect to 1.1. Ah yes, I always forget the changes to these properties

Re: Bug in whitespace handling with linefeed-treatment=ignore?

2006-06-03 Thread Manuel Mall
On Saturday 03 June 2006 17:35, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Jun 3, 2006, at 05:14, Manuel Mall wrote: snip / I don't think anything is wrong here. The definition of linefeed-treatment was changed in XSL 1.1 (its all part of refinement now) and I believe we behave correctly with respect

Re: Bug in whitespace handling with linefeed-treatment=ignore?

2006-06-03 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Jun 3, 2006, at 11:42, Manuel Mall wrote: I thought that was fixed in http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=397556view=rev Yep, missed that one. Thanks for the quick pointer. Later, Andreas

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-fop-maintenance (in module xml-fop-maintenance) failed

2006-06-03 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-fop-maintenance has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39712] New: - NullPointerExeption on table border-separation=0.04167in

2006-06-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39712. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.