Re: [Xmlgraphics-fop Wiki] Update of GoogleSummerOfCode2006/FloatsImplementationProgress by VincentHennebert

2006-06-10 Thread Simon Pepping
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:56:53AM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 09.06.2006 10:31:24 Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Jeremias, I was precisely starting to think about that. It's probably time to ask the question I had for a while regarding the patch policy: what I'm tempted to do is

Re: [Xmlgraphics-fop Wiki] Update of GoogleSummerOfCode2006/FloatsImplementationProgress by VincentHennebert

2006-06-10 Thread Simon Pepping
Vincent, Are you aware that Luca has documented his implementation on the Wiki? Simon On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 09:56:44AM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: Vincent, don't hesitate to send patches if you want to clean up and better document the code. I've recently wondered if it made sense to

Re: [Xmlgraphics-fop Wiki] Update of GoogleSummerOfCode2006/FloatsImplementationProgress by VincentHennebert

2006-06-10 Thread Clay Leeds
On Jun 10, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Simon Pepping wrote: On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:56:53AM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: That's fine. Another general possibility is to set up a special account for you with restricted write access to our repository. This has been done last year for GSoC (with some

percentage resolution in markers (was: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39560] ...)

2006-06-10 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Jun 8, 2006, at 14:30, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: Some more follow-up on the problem WRT percentage resolution in markers: snip / RetrieveMarkers are resolved in the parent's createChildLMs(), in iterating over the list of childNodes. Subsequently, the RetrieveMarker is unable to