Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Nov 20, 2007, at 17:53, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Hi Chris
Hi Andreas,
Made yet another attempt to simplify/correct the design a bit (and
hopefully fix the leak as well).
Thanks for taking the time to revisit this problem :)
Although I noticed that the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43917.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
A bit late, but still...
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
As you probably noticed, I'm looking again into improving the
performance of the intermediate format:
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/AreaTreeIntermediateXml
snip what=IFPainter vs area Tree/
If I understand well, the intermediate
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43962.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 26.11.2007 16:30:31 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi,
A bit late, but still...
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
As you probably noticed, I'm looking again into improving the
performance of the intermediate format:
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/AreaTreeIntermediateXml
snip
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43952.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
