Bug report for Fop [2008/05/04]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39983] AWTRenderer should not call System.exit().

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39983 Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43650] [PATCH] PCL Renderer Bug rendered jobs connot be printed on duplex printers

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43650 Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

think I found a bug

Hello, I already posted in the user group, but they only wonder about my error and can't help. So I think that it is a bug. I use Apache FOP 0.95beta but the same error also occured in 0.94 stable version: When trying to make a new instance of the fop factory with FopFactory fopFactory =

Re: think I found a bug

the funny thing is, that the exception only sometimes occures. sometimes it works just fine. _ Der WEB.DE SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! http://smartsurfer.web.de/?mc=100071distributionid=0066

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #23 from Luca Furini [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-05 05:59:03 PST --- Thank you for all your comments and additions, Andreas! It's good to be back after quite a long time (enough to forget the good old habit of using JUnit!)

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #24 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-05 07:15:17 PST --- (In reply to comment #23) Thank you for all your comments and additions, Andreas! It's good to be back after quite a long time (enough to forget

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38264] Hyphenation does not play well with preserved linefeed-treatment or white-space-treatment

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264 --- Comment #9 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-05 07:27:25 PST --- Trying to gain more understanding of this issue, and as I see it, the full story wrt linefeed-treatment='preserve' and hyphenate='true' is: 1) for

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44933] New: Color palette of .bmp files with 1 bit/ pixel not used

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44933 Summary: Color palette of .bmp files with 1 bit/pixel not used Product: Fop Version: 0.94 Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6178] Color palette of .bmp files with 1 bit/ pixel not used

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6178 diego [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||44933 -- Configure

Re: think I found a bug

On May 5, 2008, at 10:55, Andreas Schröder wrote: Hi I already posted in the user group, but they only wonder about my error and can't help. So I think that it is a bug. I use Apache FOP 0.95beta but the same error also occured in 0.94 stable version: When trying to make a new instance of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44935] New: Table content within tables with margin-left are offset too

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44935 Summary: Table content within tables with margin-left are offset too Product: Fop Version: all Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44935] Table content within tables with margin-left are offset too

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44935 --- Comment #1 from Dewayne Hafenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-05 08:01:20 PST --- Created an attachment (id=21921) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21921) This is an actual letter that we are using to test

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44935] Table content within tables with margin-left are offset too

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44935 Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #25 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-05 09:16:07 PST --- (In reply to comment #24) ... It is only that percentage which causes the error. For 'normal' list-item-label descendants, the base-length is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #26 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-05 09:41:40 PST --- (In reply to comment #25) Did some further research, and the ancestor tree for both footnotes' LMs (label and body) looks like:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #27 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-05 10:02:04 PST --- (In reply to comment #26) Strike that... Stopped debugging too early. The label's LM does appear if I leave it running... At the point where

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37579] footnotes within tables and listsl get lost

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37579 --- Comment #28 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-05 10:42:16 PST --- Created an attachment (id=21922) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21922) Patch for FootnoteBodyLayoutManager Naively

Re: svn commit: r653202 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/inline/TextLayoutManager.java

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kern = font.getKernValue(previous, c) * font.getFontSize() / 1000; -} +} if (kern != 0) { Uh, oh. Something went wrong with autoindentation?

Re: svn commit: r653202 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/layoutmgr/inline/TextLayoutManager.java

On May 5, 2008, at 21:15, J.Pietschmann wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: kern = font.getKernValue (previous, c) * font.getFontSize() / 1000; -} +} if (kern != 0) { Uh, oh.