DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45146] New: duplicate license.txt constrain ClassLoader

2008-06-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45146 Summary: duplicate license.txt constrain ClassLoader Product: Fop Version: 0.93 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Re: Switching to Java 1.5

2008-06-06 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
Hi all, I have attached a patch file which provides support for Retroweaver at compilation time in FOP's ant build script. You can grab the latest Retroweaver from http://downloads.sourceforge.net/retroweaver/retroweaver-2.0.5.zip. There is already quite some generics comments which could be

Re: Switching to Java 1.5

2008-06-06 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
Just stumbled upon this... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_backporting_tools Retrotranslator looks to have a more fully implemented feature set. Maybe we should try both. Adrian. Max Berger wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Fop-devs, Jess Holle schrieb:

Re: Switching to Java 1.5

2008-06-06 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On Jun 5, 2008, at 19:26, Andreas Delmelle wrote: On Jun 5, 2008, at 17:46, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Guys, I would like to raise this topic again: what about switching to Java 1.5 as a minimum requirement? No objection from me. +1 on moving forward with this in the trunk. Just to

Re: Switching to Java 1.5

2008-06-06 Thread Jess Holle
Max Berger wrote: Jess Holle schrieb: As of October of this year anything prior to Java 5 will be officially unsupported by Sun except where you have a paid support contract with them (including that for Solaris). Add to that the fact that Java 1.4 is so limiting for so many things and Java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45151] New: Building FOP from sources requries ant 1.7

2008-06-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45151 Summary: Building FOP from sources requries ant 1.7 Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2

Re: Switching to Java 1.5

2008-06-06 Thread Peter B. West
Jess Holle wrote: Max Berger wrote: Jess Holle schrieb: As of October of this year anything prior to Java 5 will be officially unsupported by Sun except where you have a paid support contract with them (including that for Solaris). Add to that the fact that Java 1.4 is so limiting for so

Re: Switching to Java 1.5

2008-06-06 Thread Jess Holle
Peter B. West wrote: Jess Holle wrote: Java 5 runs on HPUX and AIX machines as well -- as well as on Solaris x86. When you've got Windows, Mac OS X, x86 Linux, Solaris, HPUX, and AIX covered, I'd say that's pretty good. The other platforms are, er, odd balls. The question is whether you

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45152] Solid bottom border not rendered correctly since 0 .94

2008-06-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45152 --- Comment #1 from Alfred Nathaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-06 13:26:51 PST --- Created an attachment (id=22088) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22088) FO input to demonstrate the problem -- Configure

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45152] Solid bottom border not rendered correctly since 0 .94

2008-06-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45152 --- Comment #2 from Alfred Nathaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-06 13:27:33 PST --- Created an attachment (id=22089) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22089) PDF rendered with fop-0.93 -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45152] Solid bottom border not rendered correctly since 0 .94

2008-06-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45152 --- Comment #4 from Alfred Nathaniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-06 13:28:22 PST --- Created an attachment (id=22091) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22091) PDF rendered with fop-0.95beta -- Configure

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45152] Solid bottom border not rendered correctly since 0 .94

2008-06-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45152 --- Comment #5 from Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-06 13:39:16 PST --- No clue yet what the fix is, but it has to do with the implementation for border-collapse=collapse, which was added as of 0.94. For now, I can