Bug report for Fop [2009/03/08]

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] New: LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 Summary: LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo Product: Fop Version: all Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #1 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-03-09 10:50:04 PST --- FWIW: in spite of the fact that this bug is marked as applicable to 'ALL' versions, I cannot reproduce the issue with FOP Trunk on Mac OS X

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #2 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-03-09 10:53:45 PST --- Sorry, a bit too quick, but there is a logical explanation: I had commented out the last fo:block-container, which has a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46160] Automatic breaking of long landscape elements (tables) across multiple pages

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46160 --- Comment #7 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-03-09 11:06:32 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) Testing some combinations, I've just noticed a small error in FOP Trunk: reference-orientation is treated as an

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46826] New: reference-orientation treated as an inherited property

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46826 Summary: reference-orientation treated as an inherited property Product: Fop Version: 1.0dev Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46826] reference-orientation treated as an inherited property

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46826 --- Comment #1 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-03-09 11:32:21 PST --- Just to keep track of the progress: CTM.getCTMAndRelDims() seems to expect a *relative* reference-orientation (with respect to the ancestor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46826] reference-orientation treated as an inherited property

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46826 --- Comment #2 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-03-09 11:48:49 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) CTM.getCTMAndRelDims() seems to expect a *relative* reference-orientation (with respect to the ancestor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46826] reference-orientation treated as an inherited property

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46826 --- Comment #3 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-03-09 13:16:50 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23362) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23362) Proposed fix Patch fixing the issue: very

Error output of junit-layout-standard

2009-03-09 Thread Andreas Delmelle
Hi all Just updated my local sandbox, and noticed an error in the build log that I didn't quite expect: [junit] - Standard Error - [junit] Mar 9, 2009 9:00:01 PM org.apache.fop.area.AreaTreeParser $Handler setTraits [junit] SEVERE: Background image

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #3 from Adrian Cumiskey d...@cumiskey.com 2009-03-09 13:58:31 PST --- I should have looked at the FO more closely... still, this is not a very good example for someone wanting to try FOP out. It would be better to remove

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46823] LayoutException when rendering ./examples/fo/basic/blockcontainer.fo

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823 --- Comment #4 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-03-09 14:05:29 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) I should have looked at the FO more closely... still, this is not a very good example for someone wanting to try FOP

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46160] Automatic breaking of long landscape elements (tables) across multiple pages

2009-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46160 --- Comment #8 from Paul paul.suckl...@gmail.com 2009-03-09 17:19:28 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23363) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23363) Landscape table example Sorry for the delay in getting an