https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46956
Summary: Performance issue with 0.95 when comparing to 0.20
Product: Fop
Version: 0.95
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priorit
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46956
--- Comment #1 from Sunil 2009-04-02 04:45:43 PST ---
Even I have been tested with small XSL file. The result is same.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this ma
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46956
Max Berger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
Severity|major
On 01 Apr 2009, at 18:56, bonekrusher wrote:
Thanks... did the trick
FWIW: the technical explanation is that StaticPropertyList.java
contains some references to Constants.PROPERTY_COUNT. This value is
inlined into the .class file at compile-time.
Now, not so long ago, a new proprietary ext
Thanks Andreas,
A clean ant build will work - no worries
Thanks for the follow up.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Trunk---java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException%3A-273-tp22825563p22854988.html
Sent from the FOP - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46956
--- Comment #3 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-04-02
12:58:21 PST ---
Just one small remark: the 'benchmark' seems to be taken from a single run, via
the command-line (I presume?). Plain fact is that the number of classes has
increased
