On 25 May 2009, at 08:59, Remko Tronçon wrote:
Hi Remko,
Somewhat of a shame that this one hasn't been answered yet...
Apologies for that!
I have moved this thread to fop-dev@, since this is definitely a
development-related question.
If you're not on this list, please subscribe and follow
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #11 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-05-29
00:40:15 PST ---
Next failing test was inline_block_nested_6. I have investigated that closer,
and after the changes the global element list on the one hand contains more
elements th
Hi Andreas,
> Somewhat of a shame that this one hasn't been answered yet... Apologies for
> that!
That's alright, thanks for the response!
> If you haven't done so already, be sure to have a look at
> org.apache.fop.fonts.truetype.TTFFontLoader. In its private buildFont()
> method, currently an
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #12 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-05-29
08:19:24 PST ---
Remaining failing testcases are related to tables.
For table-row_keep-together.xml, the reason is that, before the changes in the
patch, we generated one consolidat
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #13 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-05-29
10:22:14 PST ---
Hi Andreas,
(In reply to comment #10)
> (OK, finally back in shape to continue working on this, and some progress in
> the meantime...)
>
> Re: the issue with the fa
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47285
Summary: Relative-positioned block-container doesn't handle
padding properly
Product: Fop
Version: all
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47285
Andreas L. Delmelle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|PC |All
OS/Version|Wind
Vincent,
> planned. Furthermore, we are in the process of bringing major changes to
> the layout engine in order to be able to handle pages of different
> widths. So any work on the current code is likely to become obsolete
> soon.
Can you tell us more? If you are confident enough to issue such a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46905
--- Comment #14 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-05-29
12:05:18 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Hi Vincent,
> The idea was that a penalty of value infinite and class EN_PAGE become a
> penalty of value 0 when considering a column bre
On 29 May 2009, at 20:55, Simon Pepping wrote:
Hi Simon, Vincent,
planned. Furthermore, we are in the process of bringing major
changes to
the layout engine in order to be able to handle pages of different
widths. So any work on the current code is likely to become obsolete
soon.
Can you te
10 matches
Mail list logo
