Re: Remove fop.bat? [was: Re: JEuclid and FOP]

2010-11-10 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I think that's a good idea. I've locally removed the fop.bat and just called "fop". Worked fine on XP despite the ".cmd" extension. Less redundancy, improved usability. +1 On 04.11.2010 11:25:10 Vincent Hennebert wrote: > Hi, > > We've been bitten several times in the past already by the fact tha

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50245] New: [PATCH] Upgrade to Java 1.5 - Added type-safe parameters to collections in Fonts

2010-11-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50245 Summary: [PATCH] Upgrade to Java 1.5 - Added type-safe parameters to collections in Fonts Product: Fop Version: all Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50245] [PATCH] Upgrade to Java 1.5 - Added type-safe parameters to collections in Fonts

2010-11-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50245 --- Comment #1 from Mehdi Houshmand 2010-11-10 10:15:48 EST --- Created an attachment (id=26280) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26280) Updated update to o.a.f.font package I missed a variable in o.a.f.FontInfo,