OK, understand on the junit headless issue. For checkstyle/findbugs it would
be useful to fail the nightly build if they do not pass. I will investigate
the necessary changes to enable this option, which I hope can be adopted.
G.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Simon Pepping
BTW, if someone would bother to nominate me as a committer, I would be happy
to do this work directly. I don't like depending on the other committers to
make progress in this area any more than you like having to address it.
G.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50723
--- Comment #7 from Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com 2011-02-23 03:45:29 EST
---
I've added a bit of testing to the o.a.f.fonts.truetype package, some of which
would be of use here, but my patch is to be applied to the
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:15:34AM -0700, Glenn Adams wrote:
OK, understand on the junit headless issue. For checkstyle/findbugs it would
be useful to fail the nightly build if they do not pass. I will investigate
the necessary changes to enable this option, which I hope can be adopted.
I
I guess we disagree, since I believe application quality and code quality
are related. And, further, I believe findbugs at least can identify real,
functional bugs (as opposed to checkstyle).
G.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Simon Pepping spepp...@leverkruid.euwrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at
On 23/02/11 14:42, Glenn Adams wrote:
I guess we disagree, since I believe application quality and code quality
are related. And, further, I believe findbugs at least can identify real,
functional bugs (as opposed to checkstyle).
While I agree with the above, I’m with Simon on this. Tests
Right now the nightly build is our CI process.
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/02/11 14:42, Glenn Adams wrote:
I guess we disagree, since I believe application quality and code quality
are related. And, further, I believe findbugs at least
Hi Simon,
On 23/02/11 07:51, Simon Pepping wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 07:15:17PM +, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
On 22/02/11 07:24, Simon Pepping wrote:
Not all FOP developers are willing to use findbugs. I hid the findbugs
errors as a courtesy to those FOP developers who do use findbugs,
Well, not quite: http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/xml-fop/
Basics work but it needs some love apparently.
On 23.02.2011 21:10:10 Glenn Adams wrote:
Right now the nightly build is our CI process.
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 23/02/11
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:10:10PM -0700, Glenn Adams wrote:
Right now the nightly build is our CI process.
That is a development-centric point of view. The nightly build is
definitely not a CI process. It is a service to the users, which must
not be interrupted by development concerns. If a
10 matches
Mail list logo
