https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50899
Summary: [PATCH] Bug in font-weight handling of SVG
Product: Fop
Version: 1.1dev
Platform: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: svg
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50899
Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On 06/03/2011 04:42, Glenn Adams wrote:
Hi Glenn,
I was just catching up on old e-mails and noticed no one replied to
this. I have added your patch to the patch queue so its not lost:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50899
Thanks for the suggestion.
Thanks,
Chris
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50901
Summary: Percental table column width not calculated from table
Product: Fop
Version: 1.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50901
--- Comment #1 from carsten.pfeif...@gebit.de 2011-03-09 08:25:48 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26751)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26751)
Patch that fixes the problem for me.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50901
--- Comment #2 from carsten.pfeif...@gebit.de 2011-03-09 08:26:45 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26752)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26752)
The RTF output without the patch applied, only 1 column is visible
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50901
--- Comment #3 from carsten.pfeif...@gebit.de 2011-03-09 08:27:15 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26753)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26753)
The RTF output without the patch applied, all column are visible
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50901
--- Comment #4 from carsten.pfeif...@gebit.de 2011-03-09 08:27:51 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26754)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26754)
For comparison, the PDF output (unaffected by the patch)
--
I’d like to launch a vote for the integration of the patch from
Bugzilla #50763 [1] into the Trunk.
The implementation of fo:basic-link would deviate from the XSL-FO 1.1
Recommendation, and behave as if the following sentence were added to
Section 6.9.2, “fo:basic-link”:
“The extent, in the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.com 2011-03-09
11:45:33 EST ---
Bug has been raised at W3C:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11672
--
Configure bugmail:
On 09/03/2011 16:44, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
I’d like to launch a vote for the integration of the patch from
Bugzilla #50763 [1] into the Trunk.
The implementation of fo:basic-link would deviate from the XSL-FO 1.1
Recommendation, and behave as if the following sentence were added to
Section
On 09/03/2011 16:56, Glenn Adams wrote:
Hi Glenn,
Has there been any definite response from the W3C for your original
bug filing that confirms your interpretation and agrees there is a
problem? If not (and I don't see a response yet in the W3C bug
report), then it may be premature to take a
The reason I ask is it is possible that Vincent's interpretation of the spec
(and the current FOP implementation) is incorrect. I am not saying it is or
it isn't. It has been my experience with the XSL-FO spec and the XSL-FO
group that straightforward interpretations are not always possible or in
On 09 Mar 2011, at 00:04, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
snip /
Why?? Where in the spec is that interpretation of the term
‘reference-area’ given?
OTOH, in Section 4.2.2: “An area for which [the is-reference-area] trait
is true is called a reference-area.”
Arrghh, too liberal interpretation
Anders was the editor of the spec, and in the best position to provide a
reading on interpretation. Sharon was the chair of that activity, so in the
best position to trigger a response.
G.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Vincent Hennebert vhenneb...@gmail.comwrote:
On 09/03/11 17:16, Glenn
On 09/03/11 17:34, Andreas Delmelle wrote:
On 09 Mar 2011, at 00:04, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
snip/
The before-edge of the region-viewport-area (V)
This is ambiguous. Of which rectangle of the region-viewport-area? The
edge is not the same whether we are talking about the
On 09.03.2011 17:05:19 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
On 09/03/11 07:51, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 08.03.2011 20:31:54 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
On 05/03/11 12:06, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 04.03.2011 16:06:30 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
On 03/03/11 12:44, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Finally, after
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50196
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Reischenbacher matthias8...@gmx.at 2011-03-09
16:07:36 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=26756)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26756)
Patch
Vincent,
thanks for applying the patch
It occurred to me that some might find it congenial to be able to
download a .WAR file that drops into Tomcat or Jetty and provides a
REST (or, perhaps, SOAP?) web service that runs FOP. Using Apache CXF,
this would be a rather straightforward exercise. This would make it
easier to set up FOP
19 matches
Mail list logo
