https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477
--- Comment #4 from quamis quamis+...@gmail.com 2012-01-18 08:16:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
2) We use the deterministic trait of the prefixes in our testing framework.
The
value of having a comprehensive test suite is far
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477
--- Comment #6 from Mehdi Houshmand med1...@gmail.com 2012-01-18 10:51:13 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #5)
/snip
An alternative approach that will also make it easier for applications to
extract or de-duplicate font resources when
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477
--- Comment #7 from quamis quamis+...@gmail.com 2012-01-18 11:27:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
That wouldn't necessarily fix the issue here. Fully embedding a font means
that
the pseudo-unique prefix isn't used, however this
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51209
--- Comment #4 from Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com 2012-01-18
11:54:59 UTC ---
Hi Luis,
Thanks for the patch. This has been committed in revision 1232845.
Thanks,
Chris
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52477
--- Comment #8 from Pascal Sancho pascal.san...@takoma.fr 2012-01-18 12:11:52
UTC ---
Since font files are versionned, how this will be handled when 2 subsets use
the same glyphes of the same font, but in different version?
subset
Hi Fellow Committers,
I was reviewing the current set of warnings generated by FindBugs and
found myself needing to add an extra exclusion. I noticed that the
exclusions file contains a lot of duplicates, e.g.
Match
Class name=org.apache.fop.render.afp.AFPImageHandlerRawCCITTFax/
Method
Hi Team
I am stuck with a peculiar problem.
My client uses FOP v 0.20.5 and I ran thru the entire website but could
not find certain feature matrix which can tell me whether
Image-As-Hyperlink or Text-As-Hyperlink will work or not.
We tried to make such hyperlinks in v0.95, and everything
On 18/01/2012 13:49, Ankit Saxena wrote:
Hi Team
Hi Ankit,
Please post questions about using FOP to fop-user mailing list. The
developers are subscribed there too.
I am stuck with a peculiar problem.
My client uses FOP v 0.20.5 and I ran thru the entire website but
could not find certain
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52416
Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version||All
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #3 from Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com 2012-01-18
15:24:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 28167
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28167
Improved Test Case with no break
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52287
--- Comment #4 from Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com 2012-01-18
15:24:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 28168
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28168
Improved test Case with forced break
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52416
--- Comment #2 from Luis Bernardo lmpmberna...@gmail.com 2012-01-18 15:51:53
UTC ---
Created attachment 28169
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28169
example fo file that shows the issue
This is the warning that is
I recall that someone (Jeremias or Simon?) had mechanically generated some
exclusions to add to this file. It is possible that duplicates got inserted
in that process. I know of no reason to retain duplicates.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Chris Bowditch
bowditch_ch...@hotmail.comwrote:
Hi
On 18/01/2012 15:51, Glenn Adams wrote:
I recall that someone (Jeremias or Simon?) had mechanically generated
some exclusions to add to this file. It is possible that duplicates
got inserted in that process. I know of no reason to retain duplicates.
Thanks Glenn. I've removed the duplicates
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project xml-fop-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
16 matches
Mail list logo
