Hi Glenn,
good job!
I noticed 2 things remaining TODO in release checklist [1]:
announcement and bugzilla entry.
I can help you for the announcement (contact list at [2] plus previous
announces below).
[1] http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/dev/release.html#checklist
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53497
--- Comment #1 from Pascal Sancho psancho@gmail.com ---
This issue stated in discussion on FOP-Users list:
http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/linefeed-treatment-quot-preserve-quot-td36204.html
--
You are receiving this mail
Thanks guys, that's 5 x +1 and no one in opposition. I'll merge in the
branch imminently and update the docs as appropriate
On 2 July 2012 14:40, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:25 AM, mehdi houshmand med1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ahh I see, ok, thanks Pascal. I think
I had started to build up a list of questions and comments but didn’t
get round to finishing it in time. Anyway, here it is, hopefully it will
still provide valuable feedback. The most important items to address are
the possible regression regarding strict FO validation and the public
API.
The
On 02/07/12 14:40, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:25 AM, mehdi houshmand med1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ahh I see, ok, thanks Pascal. I think we got our wires crossed a little
there ;)
Glenn, my plan was to merge the URI-resolution stuff in tomorrow. If this
burdens you in some way,
Glenn,
On 02/07/12 19:49, gad...@apache.org wrote:
Author: gadams
Date: Mon Jul 2 18:49:00 2012
New Revision: 1356398
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1356398view=rev
Log:
Fix broken link to permit documentation deployment.
Please port that change to the branch and revert it on the
On 02/07/12 20:12, Glenn Adams wrote:
What would people prefer?
- merging these RC1 tagged revs back to trunk now (i.e., real soon now)
Yes, but don’t delete the fop-1_1 branch after the merge. Use the
following trick to keep it alive:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53502
Priority: P2
Bug ID: 53502
Assignee: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Summary: [PATCH] AFP images without a matching end-structured
field ID would cause errors
Severity:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53502
--- Comment #1 from Robert Meyer rme...@hotmail.co.uk ---
Created attachment 29027
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29027action=edit
AFP test files zip attached need to be extracted to
test/java/org/apache/fop/afp/
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53502
--- Comment #2 from Robert Meyer rme...@hotmail.co.uk ---
Created attachment 29028
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29028action=edit
Example fail test case
Added a fail test case showing the issue. Generate AFP to
The current version of the FOP DOAP is causing problems for
projects.apache.org and so has been disabled.
-- Forwarded message --
From: s...@apache.org
Date: 3 July 2012 15:35
Subject: svn commit: r1356757 -
/infrastructure/site-tools/trunk/projects/files.xml
To:
I've applied a fix at
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1356893. If this
doesn't address it, please let me know.
Thanks,
Glenn
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:59 AM, sebb AT ASF s...@apache.org wrote:
The current version of the FOP DOAP is causing problems for
projects.apache.org
ok, i believe rsync has finally pushed through the update, so we should be
good again...
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:47 PM, sebb AT ASF s...@apache.org wrote:
The file
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/doap.rdf
is still showing as broken when I view it in Firefox and Opera.
(Chrome just
The Apache XML Graphics team is pleased to announce the immediate
availability of Apache FOP Version 1.1rc1 [1], the first candidate for
an upcoming stable 1.1 release.
Apache FOP (Formatting Objects Processor) [2] is an output independent
print formatter driven by XSL Formatting Objects (XSL-FO)
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 6:52 PM, sebb AT ASF s...@apache.org wrote:
Firefox now complains:
Error loading stylesheet: A network error occurred loading an XSLT
stylesheet:http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/xsl/p2.xsl
This probably won't affect the project build, but it does affect users
wishing to
15 matches
Mail list logo