[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13640156#comment-13640156
]
Daniela Kruse commented on FOP-2241:
I can not reproduce the issue from command line
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13640155#comment-13640155
]
Daniela Kruse commented on FOP-2241:
I can not reproduce the issue from command line
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniela Kruse updated FOP-2241:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: I can not reproduce the issue from command line because for it to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13640155#comment-13640155
]
Daniela Kruse edited comment on FOP-2241 at 4/24/13 6:31 AM:
-
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13640155#comment-13640155
]
Daniela Kruse edited comment on FOP-2241 at 4/24/13 6:32 AM:
-
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13640155#comment-13640155
]
Daniela Kruse edited comment on FOP-2241 at 4/24/13 6:33 AM:
-
I
Hi Glenn,
Can you suggest an alternative approach please?
Thanks,
Chris
On 24/04/2013 02:41, Glenn Adams wrote:
I don't like this. It negates any additional processing that may have
occurred, such as letter spacing. It requires the IF to repeat part of
the layout process. Bad idea.
On
Sure. One way to do this would be to add child elements to the font/
element in IF output as follows:
font family=Lateef style=normal ...
pua code=0xE000 gid=139/
pua code=0xE001 gid=481/
pua code=0xE002 gid=219/
/font
where these PUA mappings are collected by iterating over the characters
These are good suggestions. I am fully aware of the shortcomings that
you pointed out, but the only other option seemed to be to codify the
mappings in IF, similar to your first suggestion. However that would
mean changing IF which is not something we are keen to do since that
impacts
I see no option but to modify IF. We modified IF for 1.1 in the first
place. We have recently made quite a number of backward incompatible
changes to the FOP public APIs. I expect the next release will need to bump
the major version to 2 for FOP due to these changes, so there is little
risk in
10 matches
Mail list logo