[GitHub] fop pull request #3: FOP-1969: Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode...

GitHub user monejava opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/fop/pull/3 FOP-1969: Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for… Implemented correct handling of surrogate pairs in ApacheFOP. The supported Renderes are PDF, PS and PNG. Tests implemented when

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15506126#comment-15506126 ] simon steiner commented on FOP-1969: checkstyle is failing and i get from few examples

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15506134#comment-15506134 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Hi Simon, Thanks for taking a look to this. Co

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15506126#comment-15506126 ] simon steiner edited comment on FOP-1969 at 9/20/16 9:19 AM: - ch

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15506150#comment-15506150 ] Glenn Adams commented on FOP-1969: -- Simon, Don't merge this PR until it gets considerable

[jira] [Updated] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] simon steiner updated FOP-1969: --- Attachment: single-byte.zip needs DejaVuSans.ttf > Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepo

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15506156#comment-15506156 ] simon steiner edited comment on FOP-1969 at 9/20/16 9:28 AM: - si

[jira] [Updated] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] simon steiner updated FOP-1969: --- Attachment: pcltest.zip pcltest.zip needs FRE3OF9X.TTF > Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode

[jira] [Updated] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] simon steiner updated FOP-1969: --- Attachment: Urdu.zip Urdu.zip needs ScheherazadeRegOT.ttf > Surrogate pairs not treated as single unico

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15506241#comment-15506241 ] simon steiner edited comment on FOP-1969 at 9/20/16 10:07 AM: --

[jira] [Updated] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] simon steiner updated FOP-1969: --- Attachment: tiffttc.zip tiffttc.zip needs cambria.ttc > Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode c

Re: [jira] [Updated] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

Just to be sure we are on the same page, we can't commit arbitrary font resources to our repository, even for testing purposes, unless we determine their compatibility with ASF license requirements. On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:07 AM, simon steiner (JIRA) wrote: > > [ https://issues.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15506786#comment-15506786 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- I see the problem. {code:java|title=MultiByteF

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15506786#comment-15506786 ] Simone Rondelli edited comment on FOP-1969 at 9/20/16 2:53 PM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15507067#comment-15507067 ] Glenn Adams commented on FOP-1969: -- It will be necessary to change all GlyphSequence to use

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15507202#comment-15507202 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- GlyphSequence is already using an IntBuffer to

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15508721#comment-15508721 ] Glenn Adams commented on FOP-1969: -- It appears I introduced this code in: r1293736 | gadam

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15508787#comment-15508787 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- I see, let's keep it like this for now. But wha