[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

2016-10-24 Thread simon steiner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15602637#comment-15602637 ] simon steiner commented on FOP-1969: See

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

2016-10-24 Thread Simone Rondelli (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15602625#comment-15602625 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- The project is already using org.apache.pdfbox:fontbox thus I

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

2016-10-24 Thread simon steiner (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15602573#comment-15602573 ] simon steiner commented on FOP-1969: Should we be depending on pdfbox in fop, will affect using ant

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

2016-10-24 Thread Simone Rondelli (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15602758#comment-15602758 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Ok, now I see it. Updated the pull request to use