Dear FOP developers,

after reading this article (http://branchandbound.net/blog/security/2012/03/crossbuild-injection-how-safe-is-your-build/) about cross-build injection attacks I decided to give the pgpverify-maven-plugin (https://www.simplify4u.org/pgpverify-maven-plugin/index.html) a try.

We use Apache FOP in our project and two transitive dependencies of FOP 2.3 did not pass the PGP verification:
 - org.apache.avalon.framework:avalon-framework-api:jar:4.3.1
 - org.apache.avalon.framework:avalon-framework-impl:jar:4.3.1
both retrieved from maven central (https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/avalon/framework/avalon-framework-impl/4.3.1/)

[WARNING] org.apache.avalon.framework:avalon-framework-api:jar:4.3.1 PGP Signature ERROR        KeyId: 0xD0ACAD776E6D31C6 UserIds: [Jorg Heymans (CODE SIGNING KEY) <jheym...@apache.org>] [WARNING] C:\Users\didier\.m2\repository\org\apache\avalon\framework\avalon-framework-api\4.3.1\avalon-framework-api-4.3.1.jar [WARNING] C:\Users\didier\.m2\repository\org\apache\avalon\framework\avalon-framework-api\4.3.1\avalon-framework-api-4.3.1.jar.asc [WARNING] org.apache.avalon.framework:avalon-framework-impl:jar:4.3.1 PGP Signature ERROR        KeyId: 0xD0ACAD776E6D31C6 UserIds: [Jorg Heymans (CODE SIGNING KEY) <jheym...@apache.org>] [WARNING] C:\Users\didier\.m2\repository\org\apache\avalon\framework\avalon-framework-impl\4.3.1\avalon-framework-impl-4.3.1.jar [WARNING] C:\Users\didier\.m2\repository\org\apache\avalon\framework\avalon-framework-impl\4.3.1\avalon-framework-impl-4.3.1.jar.asc

According to the pgpverify plugin these two libraries are not correctly signed. Is there a way to replace them with a correctly signed version? If not and if they are considered as trustful, maybe it would be better to remove the signature file from the maven repository as it does not match.

I contacted Jorg Heymans about this and he told me to contact the cocoon developer mailinglist. I thought I better try this list as we actually use FOP and the Avalon-Framework is a dependency brought in by FOP.

Sincerly,

Didier Schlegel

Reply via email to