On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Andreas Delmelle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, I'm wondering... In theory, it should not be too difficult to get at
this info, since ultimately it is also needed when computing 'top' or 'left'
if they are specified as a percentage. In that case, the value is
On Jul 7, 2008, at 16:06, Luca Furini wrote:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Andreas Delmelle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, I'm wondering... In theory, it should not be too difficult to
get at
this info, since ultimately it is also needed when computing 'top'
or 'left'
if they are
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Andreas Delmelle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have the area's own dimensions, and the complement properties
(bottom-right), is that not enough?
For the renderer:
- top = (bottom - area-bpd - borders - padding))
- left = (right - area-bpd - borders -
On Jul 3, 2008, at 12:33, Luca Furini wrote:
Hi Luca
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Andreas Delmelle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have the area's own dimensions, and the complement properties
(bottom-right), is that not enough?
For the renderer:
- top = (bottom - area-bpd - borders -
(it's still me, I just subscribed with the gmail account I use more
frequently, to avoid problems of messages not reaching the list ...)
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Andreas Delmelle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have the area's own dimensions, and the complement properties
(I'm re-posting this message as I sent it yesterday and still cannot see
it in the list archives, I hope I'm not duplicating it unnecessarily)
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Luca Furini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there is a block-container with both width and height set, its
position can
While playing a bit with absolute positioned block container, I think
I stumbled into a little bug.
If there is a block-container with both width and height set, its
position can be correctly controlled using top and left (and indeed
there are many testcases checking that) but bottom and right do
