Re: Creating New org.apache.fop.fo.flow.table Package
On Nov 2, 2007, at 12:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Guys, this proposal will be based on lazy consensus. I think that table-related FObj descendants are numerous enough to deserve their own package. Moreover, creating a new sub-package will allow for more fine-grained access control of methods. And the flow package is already quite big. +1 Cheers Andreas
Re: Creating New org.apache.fop.fo.flow.table Package
Hi Vincent, You certainly have more knowledge in this area than I, so I'm quite happy to go along with your suggestion :). Adrian. Vincent Hennebert wrote: Hi Guys, this proposal will be based on lazy consensus. I think that table-related FObj descendants are numerous enough to deserve their own package. Moreover, creating a new sub-package will allow for more fine-grained access control of methods. And the flow package is already quite big. If you don’t agree, please shout! Thanks, Vincent
Creating New org.apache.fop.fo.flow.table Package
Hi Guys, this proposal will be based on lazy consensus. I think that table-related FObj descendants are numerous enough to deserve their own package. Moreover, creating a new sub-package will allow for more fine-grained access control of methods. And the flow package is already quite big. If you don’t agree, please shout! Thanks, Vincent