DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31936] [PATCH] Fonts are rendered differently between pdf and awt

2012-04-01 Thread bugzilla 
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31936

Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

--- Comment #8 from Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com 2012-04-01 06:56:16 UTC ---
batch transition pre-FOP1.0 resolved+fixed bugs to closed+fixed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31936] - [PATCH] Fonts are rendered differently between pdf and awt

2007-11-12 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31936.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31936


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-11-12 01:36 ---
The latest changes [1] should achieve the intended goal of this entry as far as
it is currently possible. Improvements are certainly still possible, for example
for Type 1 fonts by implementing a PFB and/or PFA parser like FOray has. For
Type 1 fonts, the full name of a font is still not properly reported. An
additional idea in this context is to implement a font substitution section in
the configuration file which becomes somewhat necessary now that we have font
auto-detection.

[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593189view=rev

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.