DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36508] [PATCH] Padding-* attributes handling in RTF-rendering

2012-03-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36508

Glenn Adams  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

--- Comment #6 from Glenn Adams  2012-04-01 06:31:55 UTC ---
batch transition pre-FOP1.0 resolved+fixed bugs to closed+fixed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36508] - [PATCH] Padding-* attributes handling in RTF-rendering

2005-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36508





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-06 16:42 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Do you have a reference to a document that describes this restriction? I've
> looked through versions 1.7 and 1.8 of Microsoft's RTF specification but have
> found nothing. Maybe it's possible to warn the user that there will be
> unexpected behaviour when such a constellation is encountered.

No, I havn't reference to a document. I think, it's RTF-viewer's restriction 
(here MSWord restriction), because OpenOffice.org 1.1 can display padding 
greater then 31pt.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36508] - [PATCH] Padding-* attributes handling in RTF-rendering

2005-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36508





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-06 16:33 ---
Do you have a reference to a document that describes this restriction? I've
looked through versions 1.7 and 1.8 of Microsoft's RTF specification but have
found nothing. Maybe it's possible to warn the user that there will be
unexpected behaviour when such a constellation is encountered.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36508] - [PATCH] Padding-* attributes handling in RTF-rendering

2005-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36508





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-06 15:48 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Applied. Thanks!
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278982&view=rev
> Thanks to you padding on before and after sides work well now. A quick test
> shows that the start|end sides don't quite work as expected. You might want to
> have a look at it. The following leads to strange results:
> Hello
> World!

Yes, it's quite strange. But now I can't resolved it, because if border 
specified, then padding should be in range [0..31] pt. I use MSWord as RTF-
viewer.
In above test padding was greater then 31 pt, so it was cutted.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36508] - [PATCH] Padding-* attributes handling in RTF-rendering

2005-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36508


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-09-06 14:12 ---
Applied. Thanks!

http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=278982&view=rev

Thanks to you padding on before and after sides work well now. A quick test
shows that the start|end sides don't quite work as expected. You might want to
have a look at it. The following leads to strange results:
Hello
World!


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36508] - [PATCH] Padding-* attributes handling in RTF-rendering

2005-09-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36508


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Padding-* attributes|[PATCH] Padding-* attributes
   |handling in RTF-rendering   |handling in RTF-rendering




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.