DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37329] Relaxed validation NYI for fo:table-cells
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329 Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #9 from Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com 2012-04-01 06:36:56 UTC --- batch transition pre-FOP1.0 resolved+fixed bugs to closed+fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37329] - Relaxed validation NYI for fo:table-cells
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED Summary|More readable error messages|Relaxed validation NYI for ||fo:table-cells --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-02 18:24 --- For the record: 1. I agree with Chris that FOP can't be expected to tell you where precisely in which source document the error lies (FOP is ultimately presented with the result of the XSL transform, so all the references to whatever source files you're using is lost at that point) FOP could add location info to the error message, but this makes little sense if the intermediate FO doesn't exist as a physical file. 2. The error message is, IMO, quite self-explanatory (at least for anyone who has had so much as a glance at the XSL-FO Recommendation). It simply means that an fo:table-cell should have 'zero-or- more markers' plus 'one-or-more block-level' descendants (according to the XSL-FO Rec.) 3. The relaxed validation doesn't work yet for this particular case... Either this is an oversight in the docs, or this is still TODO. I'll see if I can commit a fix for this ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37329] - Relaxed validation NYI for fo:table-cells
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-02 19:24 --- OK it's fixed. Please do note that this will only lead to usable results if the cells are really supposed to be empty. Any text-content of the cell will be silently ignored/dropped. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37329] - Relaxed validation NYI for fo:table-cells
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-02 19:34 --- On second thought: dropping it silently seemed outright stupid, so added a little warning message -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
