DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38087] [patch] force-page-count property implementation
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087 Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com 2012-04-01 06:39:38 UTC --- batch transition pre-FOP1.0 resolved+fixed bugs to closed+fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38087] - [patch] force-page-count property implementation
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-10 21:21 --- Committed the test cases. Thanks. Simon -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38087] - [patch] force-page-count property implementation
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-09 22:20 --- Thanks for the fine test cases. Re noauto: Do you really expect 18 pages? I get 17, and I think that is correct. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38087] - [patch] force-page-count property implementation
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-10 00:38 --- Yes i expect 17. I want to show the missing pageno 217 - a typical case of self-delusion. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38087] - [patch] force-page-count property implementation
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-06 22:33 --- Applied. I rearranged the calls somewhat. This is the resulting call hierarchy: PageSequence.startOfNode AreaTreeHandler.startPageSequence PSLM.doForcePageCount (previous PS if not null) PSLM.finishPage PSLM.finishPageSequence (previous PS if not null) Root.notifyPageSequenceFinished AreaTreeHandler.notifyPageSequenceFinished PageSequence.initPageNumber PageSequence.endOfNode AreaTreeHandler.endPageSequence PSLM.activateLayout PSLM.finishPage Thanks for the patch. Simon -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38087] - [patch] force-page-count property implementation
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 02:08:56PM +0100, gerhard oettl wrote: --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-03 22:23 --- I am not quite happy with the fact that checkForcePageCount is called by the next page sequence. This is an interaction between page sequences, and it is better dealt with by the controlling structure, in this case AreaTreeHandler. In other words, I go with your suggestion in the second *. I had better orderd the open questions - so think them numbered: - 1) - 2) * 2a) * 2b) * 2c) ad 1) If there is no precedence for one of the choices i will change previousPageSeqLM from public to private as proposed in the question. Agreed. ad 2) I think it is the second - what you call the second * ? Because i couldn't think it a good idea to preserve the PageSequenceLayoutManger at layoutmanger level and call it from area level, so i think i shall do the changes 2a, 2b and 2c alltogether. 2c is a must anyway. 2b is the second *. I agree with your proposal to do all three changes 2a-c. There is a little error in the last page sequence but one in your demo file. It says that next is auto-even, which is not true. yes If of any importance i can add a corrected fo to show the possibility of missing pagenumbers in case of force-page-count=no-force. Let me know. It would be good if you could turn it into a test file for the layoutengine tests, which highlights all relevant combinations of force-page-count and initial-page-number. Otherwise I will do it. .''`. gerhard oettl on Debian/Gnu Linux That's the best, as soon as I find out how to make my mike work. :-) Regards, Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38087] - [patch] force-page-count property implementation
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #17303|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-01-04 23:59 --- Created an attachment (id=17329) -- (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17329action=view) patch 2 (using area tree) ad the now 2c) At the time the checkForcePageCount is called from the AreaTreeHandler the initialPageNumber is already calced by the PageSequence without knowing about eventueally later added pages so it must be recalced. I did this by making the initPageNumber method public. If this should stay private i have to add a public recalcInitPageNumber method that does nothing than call the private initPageNumber method - at your decision. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
