DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38433.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38433
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-09 05:54 ---
Dear Jeremias,
Thank you for all afford that you have done.
My problem resolution was not to use direct transformation.
It is little annoying but simplest.
Template empty-one is not a problem because when I change the source XML in a
way that I have avoid empty nodes problem persist.
Next things that I have tried is to delete all unnecessary white spaces, and
when nothing has been changed, I was every open and close node convert to open
node and close node (node/ - node/node). After that I give up, so it is
something serious and I have conclude that problem does not depend on format of
input xml or xslt.
As I understand 0.20.5 is stable production version, and I need fop for
production version of software, so my question is: Is it risky to put 0.91 in
production, and when can we expected that 0.91 will start to be stable
(production) version of FOP (april, may, jun)?
It's look like that delay is unavoidable. Thanks again.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
