DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39033] A minor Java2D compatibility issue

2012-03-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39033

Glenn Adams  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

--- Comment #4 from Glenn Adams  2012-04-01 06:26:19 UTC ---
batch transition pre-FOP1.0 resolved+fixed bugs to closed+fixed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39033] - A minor Java2D compatibility issue

2006-04-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39033





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-10 15:07 ---
> Patch applied. Thank you. I've had to modify it a bit. The cycle wasn't 
properly
> handled.

Sory I do not use cycle so I forgot about it.

> > I also suspect that the rasterization painting fallback generates 
rasterized 
> > images upside down.
> I don't see anything like that. If you can provide some Java code that
> reproduces this, we can try to sort it out.

I posted it as another report #39261

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39033] - A minor Java2D compatibility issue

2006-04-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39033


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-04-10 11:45 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Enancement: convert java.awt.GradientPaint to batik's LinearGradientPaint to 
> avoid rasterization when painting. This is useful when someone uses 
> PDFGraphics2D outside FOP (like me :)

Patch applied. Thank you. I've had to modify it a bit. The cycle wasn't properly
handled.

http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392917&view=rev

> I also suspect that the rasterization painting fallback generates rasterized 
> images upside down.

I don't see anything like that. If you can provide some Java code that
reproduces this, we can try to sort it out.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39033] - A minor Java2D compatibility issue

2006-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39033





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-03-20 11:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=17925)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17925&action=view)
PDFGraphics2D.java patch


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.