DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41062] Defect reading hyphenation patterns

2012-04-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41062

--- Comment #3 from Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com 2012-04-07 01:44:35 UTC ---
resetting P2 open bugs to P3 pending further review

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41062] Defect reading hyphenation patterns

2012-04-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41062

Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P2  |P3

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41062] - Defect reading hyphenation patterns

2006-11-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41062.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41062





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-11-28 14:59 ---
Umm, delete the comment about readToken always returning null. The design is
still somewhat horrible.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41062] - Defect reading hyphenation patterns

2006-11-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41062.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41062





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-11-28 15:33 ---
Further points
- Using a ternary tree for the charclass arrays seems to be wasteful. Two
  parallel arrays and a Array binary search should be sufficient.
- The charclass parser wont check whether a . (dot) represents a class. The
  dot is reserved as begin/end of word marker in patterns, using it als
  class representation will probably cause problems.
- The pattern parser wont check whether the non-digits in the patterns are
  actually charclass representations.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.