DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42748] FOP 0.93 is not resolving empty fo:inline index markers

2012-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748

Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

--- Comment #9 from Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com 2012-04-01 07:10:19 UTC ---
batch transition pre-FOP1.0 resolved+fixed bugs to closed+fixed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42748] FOP 0.93 is not resolving empty fo:inline index markers

2010-05-23 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748

Bela Hausmann p...@belahausmann.name changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||p...@belahausmann.name

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42748] - FOP 0.93 is not resolving empty fo:inline index markers

2007-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-11-02 04:35 ---

Just been looking into this one a bit more closely, and got it working, but the 
problem here was hidden a 
bit deeper... Empty inlines, up to now, did not even generate a LayoutManager 
(see: 
org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.LayoutManagerMapping, around line 270).

Now that this has been traced, adding an empty InlineKnuthSequence if the 
inline has no content, seems 
to fix the issue.

Expect the fix to be committed to the trunk soon.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42748] - FOP 0.93 is not resolving empty fo:inline index markers

2007-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-11-02 13:02 ---
Fixed in FOP trunk. see: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=591437view=rev

Thanks for reporting!

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42748] - FOP 0.93 is not resolving empty fo:inline index markers

2007-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-29 08:23 ---

 This is not really a problem.  It is a very minor warning log message that 
 will
 only occur in this particular situation.  It occurs because ids are tracked 
 only
 for content that actually takes up space on the page output.  Anything else is
 ignored/discarded.

FYI (and that of people who find this bug on google)

DITA Open Toolkit 1.4 produces empty fo:inline index markers for all
table-of-contents entries, on the grounds that TOC references are point
references and so should not correspond to a region of actual space on the page
output. This does not work with FOP 0.94.

To work around, edit DITA/xslfo/dita2fo-titles.xsl and
DITA/xslfo/dita2fo-subroutines.xsl to put the zero-width breaking space entity
#x200B; in the inlines.



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42748] - FOP 0.93 is not resolving empty fo:inline index markers

2007-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-29 08:30 ---

Flagged as bug 1822157 on dita-ot

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1822157group_id=132728atid=725074

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42748] - FOP 0.93 is not resolving empty fo:inline index markers

2007-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-29 08:45 ---
Right, this is a bug. Since I don't have time right now to fix this, here's what
needs to be done:
fo:inline, like fo:block, can be empty but carry an id that can be referenced.
For the id to survive until the rendering time, the InlineLayoutManager has to
create a zero-length Knuth box for the empty FO in a similar ways as we do it
for fo:block in BlockStackingLayoutManager:
  //Empty fo:block, zero-length box makes sure the IDs are registered.
  returnList.add(new KnuthBox(0, notifyPos(new Position(this)), true));

The reason for this: If there's no Knuth box for a particular formatting object,
the area creation stage (addAreas()) is not done and therefore the IDs are not
registered on the current page.

There are probably other inline FOs that need this treatment, too. Better find
that out first, create a test case and fix all together.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42748] - FOP 0.93 is not resolving empty fo:inline index markers

2007-10-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748





--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-29 11:13 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
 Right, this is a bug. Since I don't have time right now to fix this, here's 
 what
 needs to be done:

OK, I'll look into it. I'm looking into getting fo:markers working for inlines 
as well, and already ran into this 
very obstacle (as well as some others).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42748] - FOP 0.93 is not resolving empty fo:inline index markers

2007-07-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P2  |P5




--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-04 02:54 ---
This is not really a problem.  It is a very minor warning log message that will
only occur in this particular situation.  It occurs because ids are tracked only
for content that actually takes up space on the page output.  Anything else is
ignored/discarded.  There is no application error here, its just an unwanted
warning message - so I suggest we ignore it for now.

Adrian.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42748] - FOP 0.93 is not resolving empty fo:inline index markers

2007-06-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42748


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.