DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43591] NullPointerException when min-height is specified for table-row
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43591 Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com 2012-04-01 06:42:30 UTC --- batch transition pre-FOP1.0 resolved+fixed bugs to closed+fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43591] - NullPointerException when min-height is specified for table-row
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43591. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43591 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-11 03:35 --- Confirmed. I tested your FO on the latest code from Trunk and NPE still occurs there too :-( -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43591] - NullPointerException when min-height is specified for table-row
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43591. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |enhancement --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-11 03:45 --- Right, but we also don't claim that min-height is implemented. See here: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-property-min-height block-progression-dimension.minimum does the same thing and that works. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43591] - NullPointerException when min-height is specified for table-row
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43591. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |major --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-11 04:41 --- Jeremias, I agree that min-height is declared to be unsupported on 0.94. Still, not supporting a feature does not make it right to abort on a runtime exception such as a NullPointerException. fo:table with table-layout=auto is also not supported; however, using table-layout=auto is handled correctly: A message is displayed saying that it is not supported, but processing *continues* while the unsupported attribute is ignored. I would expect the same kind of behavior (logging a message ignoring the unsupported attribute) when using min-height. Hoping that my claim convinced anybody, I am re-setting severity to Major; NullPointerExceptions due to incomplete / unsupported code is an extremely bad practice IMO. I will attempt to create an Eclipse workspace using the Trunk version and submit a patch for it. Isaac -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43591] - NullPointerException when min-height is specified for table-row
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43591. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43591 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OS/Version|Windows XP |All Version|0.94|1.0dev --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-11 09:30 --- (In reply to comment #3) Still, not supporting a feature does not make it right to abort on a runtime exception such as a NullPointerException. snip / Agreed. I'll see if I can add a warning for this unimplemented property. Note that 'block-progression-dimension.minimum' is a valid alternative only in certain circumstances (depending on reference-orientation and writing-mode). 'b-p-d' is not always the same as 'height'. If it were that simple, we'd probably have implemented it already... On the same note: since the issue still exists in FOP Trunk, and it is probably safe to say that it can be reproduced on all platforms, I have changed those bug-properties as well. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
