DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47530] Problem with fo:wrapper inside block-container or table-cell
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530 Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23983|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #23984|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #23985|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #9 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2011-02-06 05:39:44 EST --- Created an attachment (id=26611) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26611) potential fix Attached patch fixes the issue (+ updates test case wrapper_block.xml), for all potential parents to the fo:wrapper except fo:list-item-label. One additional issue with wrappers as children of a regular block pops up (see comment in test case), but that is not related to this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47530] Problem with fo:wrapper inside block-container or table-cell
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530 --- Comment #8 from ms...@freezone.co.uk 2009-12-01 23:19:16 UTC --- Currently experiencing this problem with trunk revision 834135 and, [...] fo:list-item-body fo:wrapper [...] /fo:wrapper /fo:list-item-body [...] java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.InlineKnuthSequence canno t be cast to org.apache.fop.layoutmgr.ListElement at org.apache.fop.cli.InputHandler.transformTo(InputHandler.java:302) at org.apache.fop.cli.InputHandler.renderTo(InputHandler.java:130) at org.apache.fop.cli.Main.startFOP(Main.java:174) at org.apache.fop.cli.Main.main(Main.java:205) -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47530] Problem with fo:wrapper inside block-container
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530 Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-07-15 13:07:07 PST --- Not sure what to do with this. The patch just seems copied over from FOP Trunk (?) The 0.94 release is considered final, and no changes are made anymore to the corresponding development branch. If you really need the fix, then it is recommended to use the more recent version. Anyway, may be good to have in the archives for people that are stuck on 0.94, but still a WONTFIX... -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47530] Problem with fo:wrapper inside block-container or table-cell
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530 Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fo tree |page-master/layout Platform|PC |All Version|0.94|1.0dev Summary|Problem with fo:wrapper |Problem with fo:wrapper |inside block-container |inside block-container or ||table-cell OS/Version|Windows XP |All --- Comment #7 from Andreas L. Delmelle adelme...@apache.org 2009-07-15 13:58:34 PST --- I see... Checked and confirmed. The sample testcase fails validation in fop-trunk, but that was easily fixed by removing the rowspan from the table-cell. After doing that, I get the ClassCastException too. Also occurs if you remove the block-container from the picture. At any rate, I think the fix is even simpler. In that particular code-blocks, there seems to be no reason whatsoever to use the BlockLevelLM interface and we can simply declare the variables as plain LayoutManager. We can use a similar check as is now made in FlowLM (in trunk), since the wrapper should definitely not be ignored. If it only contains an empty block, it makes no difference, but if the block has content, then that should be rendered normally. The check should probably be factored into a separate method to avoid unnecessary code-duplication. The fact that I had this fixed for FlowLM at some point, and now the same issue still exists for two other BlockStackingLMs just screams for improvement... Thanks for reporting! -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47530] Problem with fo:wrapper inside block-container
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530 --- Comment #1 from Pablo Ruiz pablo.r...@gmail.com 2009-07-14 17:19:11 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23983) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23983) Sample (but a bit complex) fo file to reproduce the problem.. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47530] Problem with fo:wrapper inside block-container
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530 --- Comment #2 from Pablo Ruiz pablo.r...@gmail.com 2009-07-14 19:19:42 PST --- After a bit of work, I've managed to make a patch overcoming this bug. See attached patch, and simplified fo file to reproduce the problem. Greets. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47530] Problem with fo:wrapper inside block-container
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530 --- Comment #3 from Pablo Ruiz pablo.r...@gmail.com 2009-07-14 19:20:32 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23984) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23984) Simplified failing fo file. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 47530] Problem with fo:wrapper inside block-container
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47530 --- Comment #4 from Pablo Ruiz pablo.r...@gmail.com 2009-07-14 19:21:41 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23985) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23985) Patch fixing the problem.. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
