DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50575] Binary release of fop-1.0 gives Error reading event-model.xml when run on RHEL5

2012-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50575

Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED

--- Comment #7 from Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com 2012-04-01 13:42:47 UTC ---
batch transition to closed for remaining resolved bugs

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50575] Binary release of fop-1.0 gives Error reading event-model.xml when run on RHEL5

2011-08-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50575

--- Comment #6 from Simon Pepping spepp...@apache.org 2011-08-31 18:39:49 UTC 
---
I made some notes about possible alternative build procedures on the FOP wiki,
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/HowTo/BuildFOPAlternatively

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50575] Binary release of fop-1.0 gives Error reading event-model.xml when run on RHEL5

2011-08-29 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50575

Simon Pepping spepp...@apache.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX

--- Comment #5 from Simon Pepping spepp...@apache.org 2011-08-29 11:37:23 UTC 
---
FOP's own build process generates the event-model files correctly. Therefore
this is not a FOP bug.

For alternative build processes I have the following recommendation:

We noticed that qdox.jar cannot be inserted in the CLASSPATH variable for the
ant build process. Doing so invariably generates an NPE. Even this command:

CLASSPATH=lib/build/qdox-1.6.3.jar ant clean resourcegen

i.e., using FOP's own qdox jar file, fails with a NPE.

Debian now solved the problem by copying their qdox jar into FOP's lib/build
directory before the build. The resulting fop.jar contains the required event
models, and seems to work well.

It would be good if alternative builds of fop would run a number of our junit
tests. The fop team should look into this to formulate a recommendation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50575] Binary release of fop-1.0 gives Error reading event-model.xml when run on RHEL5

2011-08-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50575

--- Comment #4 from r.landm...@redhat.com 2011-08-28 23:42:27 UTC ---
FWIW, This same issue has prevented us shipping FOP at all in Fedora 15, and
with Fedora 16 around the corner, we won't be shipping FOP there either unless
we can figure this out :(

Our downstream bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689930

It's only that the various event-model.xml files don't get generated at build
time. The FOP 1.0-16 referred to in that bug was a version I built that just
included those XML files copied directly from the upstream binary. With the
files in place, FOP worked fine. But without being able to figure out how to
generate them during the build, we can't ship it, so this is a show-stopper for
us. :(

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50575] Binary release of fop-1.0 gives Error reading event-model.xml when run on RHEL5

2011-08-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50575

--- Comment #2 from mathieu.malate...@gmail.com 2011-08-25 13:54:53 UTC ---
I can confirm this bug is also present on debian, where fop is being build from
source.

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639162

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50575] Binary release of fop-1.0 gives Error reading event-model.xml when run on RHEL5

2011-08-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50575

mathieu.malate...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mathieu.malate...@gmail.com

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50575] Binary release of fop-1.0 gives Error reading event-model.xml when run on RHEL5

2011-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50575

--- Comment #1 from Simon Pepping spepp...@apache.org 2011-01-12 03:58:01 EST 
---
If you used the binary release from the ASF, all existing event models are
included. It seems that an event model is missing for notification of font
substitution.

Can you provide a small sample file that displays the problem?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.