https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677
Sergey Vladimirov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677
--- Comment #5 from Glenn Adams 2012-04-01 15:34:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Chris,
>
> It's not a bugfix neither new feature, but a performance patch. So there is no
> exception neither unworking code that magically became worki
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677
Chris Bowditch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
Configure bugmail: h
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677
--- Comment #4 from Chris Bowditch 2011-08-22
16:11:08 UTC ---
Hi Sergey,
I understand it is not a bug and the change doesn't fix an error. I simply
meant that it is good practice to supply a test file for every code change.
Regardless of
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677
--- Comment #3 from Sergey Vladimirov 2011-08-22 14:13:39
UTC ---
Chris,
It's not a bugfix neither new feature, but a performance patch. So there is no
exception neither unworking code that magically became working after applying
the patc
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677
--- Comment #2 from Chris Bowditch 2011-08-22
13:19:20 UTC ---
Hi Sergey,
Thanks for the patch. It looks good in principal. Can you also attach some form
of test case? If your own XSL-FO is private then please create an artificial
example
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677
Chris Bowditch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Small logging performance |[PATCH] Small logging
