DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51677] [PATCH] Small logging performance fix for BreakingAlgorithm

2012-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677

Sergey Vladimirov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
 Resolution||WONTFIX

--- Comment #6 from Sergey Vladimirov  2012-04-01 19:55:24 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Sergey, do you expect to provide a test FO file for verifying the impact of
> your performance patch? if not, then I will move this bug to resolved+wontfix,
> thanks Glenn

Glenn,

I'm can't provide test file anymore.

Sergey

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51677] [PATCH] Small logging performance fix for BreakingAlgorithm

2012-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677

--- Comment #5 from Glenn Adams  2012-04-01 15:34:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Chris,
> 
> It's not a bugfix neither new feature, but a performance patch. So there is no
> exception neither unworking code that magically became working after applying
> the patch. What kind of test case you want me to create?
> 
> I still can provide example document, but the only different thing is 
> execution
> time.
> 
> Best regards,
> Sergey

Sergey, do you expect to provide a test FO file for verifying the impact of
your performance patch? if not, then I will move this bug to resolved+wontfix,
thanks Glenn

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51677] [PATCH] Small logging performance fix for BreakingAlgorithm

2012-01-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677

Chris Bowditch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51677] [PATCH] Small logging performance fix for BreakingAlgorithm

2011-08-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677

--- Comment #4 from Chris Bowditch  2011-08-22 
16:11:08 UTC ---
Hi Sergey,

I understand it is not a bug and the change doesn't fix an error. I simply
meant that it is good practice to supply a test file for every code change.
Regardless of the affect the change has. If I make up a test file I may get
very different results from you, and if I perceive no performance improvement
then I would be reluctant to commit the change. If however, we use the same
test file, then our results should be aligned. Do you see what I mean? Of
course, it would be prudent for any developer to try out multiple test files,
not just 1, but I still think it would be useful for you to provide a test
XSL-FO.

Thanks,

Chris

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51677] [PATCH] Small logging performance fix for BreakingAlgorithm

2011-08-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677

--- Comment #3 from Sergey Vladimirov  2011-08-22 14:13:39 
UTC ---
Chris,

It's not a bugfix neither new feature, but a performance patch. So there is no
exception neither unworking code that magically became working after applying
the patch. What kind of test case you want me to create?

I still can provide example document, but the only different thing is execution
time.

Best regards,
Sergey

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51677] [PATCH] Small logging performance fix for BreakingAlgorithm

2011-08-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677

--- Comment #2 from Chris Bowditch  2011-08-22 
13:19:20 UTC ---
Hi Sergey,

Thanks for the patch. It looks good in principal. Can you also attach some form
of test case? If your own XSL-FO is private then please create an artificial
example. Obviously I can create my own test case, but it is good practise to
submit a test case with any code change.

Thanks,

Chris

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51677] [PATCH] Small logging performance fix for BreakingAlgorithm

2011-08-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677

Chris Bowditch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Small logging performance   |[PATCH] Small logging
   |fix for BreakingAlgorithm   |performance fix for
   ||BreakingAlgorithm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug.