[Jeremias Maerki]
Looks like you made a thorough analysis. What I read made sense to me
although I didn't check everything to the last character. Providing
the Context interface through the LayoutContext didn't occur to me
and I don't know if it's the right way, but if it just clicks in
there
(comments inline)
On 24.08.2005 09:10:26 Finn Bock wrote:
[Jeremias Maerki]
Looks like you made a thorough analysis. What I read made sense to me
although I didn't check everything to the last character. Providing
the Context interface through the LayoutContext didn't occur to me
and I
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:33 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
snip/
BTW, I'm very positively surprised and extremely pleased about your
contributions so far. Is your boss supporting you or have you simply
become addicted to FOP? :-) Just curious.
Jeremias,
Thank you for your kind words. If you mean
I have just documented the rules with respect to determining the base
value for percentage calculations on the WIKI [1]. I also looked at the
fop-dev messages related to the code in this area ([2] and [3]).
If my analysis in [1] is correct we have broadly speaking 4 different
cases to
I am currently looking at the XSL-FO spec with respect to resolving
percentages in property values because it was mentioned on this list that
the current system in FOP needs improvements. For many properties the spec
refers to the 'closest ancestor block area that is not a line area'. This
again