Hi Ben,
Thank you very much for your interest in FOP and your contribution. I’ve
opened a Bugzilla issue containing your patch so that it can easily be
referred to:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47314
It is likely to interest other users who run into similar memory issues,
is not tied to the
end of page-sequences.
Cheers.
Ben.
-Original Message-
From: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:vhenneb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 7:35 AM
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Cc: Chris Fanjoy; Jody Brownell; Glen Campbell
Subject: Re: Apache FOP 0.95 Patch
Hi Ben
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:35:17AM +0100, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
It is likely to interest other users who run into similar memory issues,
and the good thing of having made it against the 0.95 release is that it
won???t be made obsolete by further changes in the code.
We are not going to
On 04 Jun 2009, at 14:11, Simon Pepping wrote:
Hi Ben, Simon Vincent,
snip /
Indeed, it is a horrible hack with regard to the meaning of a
page-sequence. But it is an interesting solution to the problem of
influencing FOP's page breaking algorithm.
The very same thoughts over here. A
easier to modify the RTF
rendering because it does not use the Page Breaking Algorithm.
Regards,
Ben.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:andreas.delme...@telenet.be]
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 9:35 AM
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache FOP 0.95
On 04 Jun 2009, at 14:53, Ben Wuest wrote:
Hi Ben
I agree that this should happen behind the scenes without the user
having to specify anything. I had to perform this work-around the
way I
did because of our current time constraints. Hopefully, this can lead
to something else.
