Re: arabic semicolon

2016-06-22 Thread Glenn Adams 
The problem is that the preceding letter, HAH, is incorrectly presenting
the INITIAL form. Please open a JIRA issue and provide minimal FO input and
this PDF. I know which code to check, so you can assign to me.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
> *Sent:* 22 June 2016 14:56
> *To:* FOP Developers <fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: arabic semicolon
>
>
>
> No, it is never joined. Can you send PDF?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> If I have a arabic semicolon it seems to be joined to next glyph and
> output looks wrong. Is ZWNJ required to be used?
>
>
>
> ح؛
> 
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>

RE: arabic semicolon

2016-06-22 Thread Simon Steiner 
 

 

From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com] 
Sent: 22 June 2016 14:56
To: FOP Developers <fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org>
Subject: Re: arabic semicolon

 

No, it is never joined. Can you send PDF?

 

 

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Simon Steiner <simonsteiner1...@gmail.com 
<mailto:simonsteiner1...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Hi,

 

If I have a arabic semicolon it seems to be joined to next glyph and output 
looks wrong. Is ZWNJ required to be used?

 

ح؛

 

Thanks

 



out.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Re: arabic semicolon

2016-06-22 Thread Glenn Adams 
No, it is never joined. Can you send PDF?


On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Simon Steiner 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> If I have a arabic semicolon it seems to be joined to next glyph and
> output looks wrong. Is ZWNJ required to be used?
>
>
>
> ح؛
> 
>
>
>
> Thanks
>