This vote was launched while discussion was still going on on the
mailing list. It would have been good to wait that a consensus is
reached, which I don’t think has happened yet. What was the urgency to
launch the vote now?
I haven’t received any answer to my concerns about the following
metrics:
I will vote -0 with reasons I have already expressed in the 'Merge
Request - Temp_ComplexScripts into Trunk' thread.
I hope we can go forward refining this work, along with the rest FOP,
through constructive collaboration, respecting the varied degrees of
experiences, expertises and passion that
Seven committers voted. There were five +1 votes and no -1 votes. There
was one -0.9 vote and one -0 vote.
According to the Project Charter three +1 ('yes' votes) with no -1
('no' votes or vetoes) are needed to approve a significant code
change. Therefore the proposal to merge the
Thank you FOP team. As I have stated previously, I am prepared to improve
and maintain this code moving forward, including adding comments for local
variables not already described, and refactoring certain classes to reduce
class size.
I've also given some thought to moving the new CS classes in
I vote positive too: +1
Le 25/10/2011 10:31, Simon Pepping a écrit :
With his latest patch, Glenn Adams wrote:
With this latest patch I am satisfied that there is sufficient testing and
stability in the CS branch to support its merger into trunk. Therefore, I
request that such a merge be
On 25/10/2011 09:31, Simon Pepping wrote:
With his latest patch, Glenn Adams wrote:
Hi All,
With this latest patch I am satisfied that there is sufficient testing and
stability in the CS branch to support its merger into trunk. Therefore, I
request that such a merge be accomplished after
Following this request, I herewith propose to merge the branch
Temp_ComplexScripts into trunk, and launch a formal vote.
I vote positive: +1
For the rules of voting about code commits, see the project charter,
article 11, http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics/ProjectCharter.
Simon Pepping
Hi,
There was a discussion about enabling it by default, with some
performances tests.
see http://marc.info/?l=fop-devm=131108266423848w=2
Le 25/10/2011 14:54, The Web Maestro a écrit :
Following this request, I herewith propose to merge the branch
Temp_ComplexScripts into trunk, and launch a
Thanks Pascal! And thank you Glenn! Great work!
+1 from me!
My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
- HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet
On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:29 AM, Pascal Sancho pascal.san...@takoma.fr wrote:
Hi,
There was a discussion about enabling it by default, with some
The short answer is that if you do not wish to be affected by complex script
support, you can use the new -nocs command line option or you can specify
complex-scripts disabled='true'/ in your FOP configuration file.
Keep in mind that Latin (Roman), Cyrillic, and Greek scripts also benefit
from
The vote runs for three days, and will end on Friday 28 October 2011
at 18:00h UTC.
Simon Pepping
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:31:43AM +0200, Simon Pepping wrote:
Following this request, I herewith propose to merge the branch
Temp_ComplexScripts into trunk, and launch a formal vote.
For the
+1 from me. A lot of work, a great achievement.
On 25 October 2011 12:10, Simon Pepping spepp...@leverkruid.eu wrote:
The vote runs for three days, and will end on Friday 28 October 2011
at 18:00h UTC.
Simon Pepping
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:31:43AM +0200, Simon Pepping wrote:
12 matches
Mail list logo
