Re: [VOTE] Release of FOP 1.0 cancelled

2010-07-11 Thread Simon Pepping
Because a serious problem has been reported with the source distribution files, I herewith cancel the vote. I will rebuild the release after fixing the reported problems, and reopen a vote. Simon On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:54:41PM +0200, Simon Pepping wrote: The release files for fop 1.0 are

Re: [VOTE] Release of FOP 1.0

2010-07-10 Thread Simon Pepping
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 05:36:48PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Hi Simon, I downloaded the tarball from:http://people.apache.org/~spepping/fop-1_0/fop-1.0-src.tar.gz $ md5sum fop-1.0-src.tar.gz bb921758e2eb4327b7ac01c5f5fec455 fop-1.0-src.tar.gz It seems the ant rule should be

Re: [VOTE] Release of FOP 1.0

2010-07-10 Thread Simon Pepping
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:54:21AM +0200, Simon Pepping wrote: Right, lib/build did not exist in the previous release. Apparently it has not been added to the build rule at its creation. So I will have to revise the rule. Should all files in lib/build be added to the release, except

Re: [VOTE] Release of FOP 1.0

2010-07-10 Thread Simon Pepping
I am not in favor of including all jar files in lib/build in the source distribution. Do we use retroweaver? I seem to recall that that was a plan on which we did not execute. Do we need to include tools for PMD and Findbugs reports? Or for doing XMLUnit tests? They are not essential build tools,

Re: [VOTE] Release of FOP 1.0

2010-07-10 Thread The Web Maestro
So is this VOTE cancelled? On Jul 10, 2010, at 6:37 AM, Simon Pepping spepp...@leverkruid.eu wrote: I am not in favor of including all jar files in lib/build in the source distribution. Do we use retroweaver? I seem to recall that that was a plan on which we did not execute. Do we need to

Re: [VOTE] Release of FOP 1.0

2010-07-09 Thread Simon Pepping
I removed the files accidentally. They are being uploaded again. Simon On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 04:54:41PM +0200, Simon Pepping wrote: The release files for fop 1.0 are now ready for review and the release vote. The release files are built from:

Re: [VOTE] Release of FOP 1.0

2010-07-09 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Hi Simon, I downloaded the tarball from:http://people.apache.org/~spepping/fop-1_0/fop-1.0-src.tar.gz $ md5sum fop-1.0-src.tar.gz bb921758e2eb4327b7ac01c5f5fec455 fop-1.0-src.tar.gz It seems the ant rule should be adapted since lib/build has been removed from the tarball. log: Buildfile: