Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36224] New: - [PATCH] Support for CCITTFaxDecode filter (TIFF images) in PDF Renderer

2005-08-24 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Ok, this is bigger than I thought. I've written down my findings and a
few thoughts. Need to think about priorities, first.

http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ImageSupport

On 24.08.2005 11:00:12 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I'm running into exactly this problem right now with the BatchDiffer.
> I'll look into it.
> 
> On 17.08.2005 15:04:21 bugzilla wrote:
> > There is most likely still a fundamental problem with respect to image 
> > decoding
> > and the image cache left. As renderers differ in their ability to handle an
> > image in its raw format or decoded the format, the image bitmap stored (raw 
> > or
> > decoded) depends on the first renderer loading it. If in a subsequent 
> > invocation
> > a different renderer get the same image from the cache it may not be in the
> > format that the second renderer expects leading to undesirable results. I'll
> > leave that for a later time.
> 
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki



Jeremias Maerki



Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36224] New: - [PATCH] Support for CCITTFaxDecode filter (TIFF images) in PDF Renderer

2005-08-24 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I'm running into exactly this problem right now with the BatchDiffer.
I'll look into it.

On 17.08.2005 15:04:21 bugzilla wrote:
> There is most likely still a fundamental problem with respect to image 
> decoding
> and the image cache left. As renderers differ in their ability to handle an
> image in its raw format or decoded the format, the image bitmap stored (raw or
> decoded) depends on the first renderer loading it. If in a subsequent 
> invocation
> a different renderer get the same image from the cache it may not be in the
> format that the second renderer expects leading to undesirable results. I'll
> leave that for a later time.



Jeremias Maerki