Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52655] [PATCH] single-byte encoding mode

2012-02-13 Thread Glenn Adams
Thanks. No need to go in depth, a one line of the problem description should be sufficient. Actually, the bug title should capture the essence of the problem. On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Luis Bernardo wrote: > Glenn, > > You are right and I was aware of the shortcomings in the description,

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52655] [PATCH] single-byte encoding mode

2012-02-13 Thread Luis Bernardo
Glenn, You are right and I was aware of the shortcomings in the description, but it is not easy to describe short of providing example, which was what I did. But I will elaborate the description just the same. Luis On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > Luis, > > Could you elabor

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52655] [PATCH] single-byte encoding mode

2012-02-13 Thread Glenn Adams
Luis, Could you elaborate the information in this bug report? All you say is: "The attached patch fixes an issue with fonts with single-byte encoding mode." Generally bug reports should attempt to describe the issue, at least to give a general understanding of it. Thanks, Glenn On Mon, Feb 13,